Repair of Groin Hernias After Abdominal Prostatectomy With Robotic TAPP

NCT ID: NCT04718597

Last Updated: 2021-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This retrospective study investigates if robotic assisted groin hernia repair in patients who previously underwent abdominal prostatectomy has an equal or more favorable clinical outcome, compared to open repair in those patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the personal practice of the investigators, there has been a decrease in open groin hernia repair from 17% to 6% since the introduction of robotic assisted surgery. This reflects a change in indication for complex hernias from an open to a minimal invasive approach. One of the typical indications for open approach before adopting the robotic platform were groin hernias after previous abdominal prostatectomy. Since prostatectomy results in scarring of the retropubic area where we need to dissect during MIS groin hernia repair, an open anterior approach is often suggested. With the enhanced view and instrument dexterity of the robotic platform, the investigators have now changed to a minimal invasive approach in these patients.

Therefore, this study will evaluate the clinical outcome after robotic assisted repair of groin hernias in patients who previously underwent an abdominal prostatectomy in comparison to open groin hernia repair.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inguinal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open hernia repair

Patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair via an open Liechtenstein procedure

Open inguinal hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Classical approach (open repair)

Robotic assisted hernia repair

Patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair via robotic assisted laparoscopy

Robotic assisted inguinal hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robotic assisted inguinal hernia repair with DaVinci Xi system instead of open repair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic assisted inguinal hernia repair

Robotic assisted inguinal hernia repair with DaVinci Xi system instead of open repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open inguinal hernia repair

Classical approach (open repair)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients
* Underwent uni-or bilateral groin hernia repair in the period March 2015 - March 2020
* Groin hernia repair via robotic assisted laparoscopy or open surgery
* History of abdominal prostatectomy before the groin hernia repair

Exclusion Criteria

* Age below 18
* Groin hernia repair via conventional laparoscopy
* Groin hernia repair via open surgery other than Liechtenstein method
* Groin hernia repair without mesh placement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Filip Muysoms

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Filip Muysoms, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AZ Maria Middelares

Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MMS.2020.067

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.