Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair

NCT ID: NCT05839587

Last Updated: 2025-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-11

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study seeks to determine whether improved visual acuity and enhanced flexibility of the robotic platform results in a reduced surgical stress response and an improvement in indices of surgical outcome measures for simple and complex inguinal hernia repair

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Complex inguinal hernia repair is challenging and requires both advanced skills in laparoscopic surgery and knowledge about the complex anatomy of the inguinal area. Whereas the repair of a small inguinal hernia usually is simple and straightforward, complex hernias (large inguinoscrotal and recurrent hernias) constitute a surgical challenge due to the risk of damage of the neurovascular structures in the inguinal area. It requires advanced laparoscopic skills to reduce the hernial sac in patients with large lateral hernias, where the hernial sac often extends deep into the scrotum in close vicinity to the spermatic cord and the testicular artery. This dissection is difficult with conventional laparoscopy, which may explain the risk of chronic pain, testicular hypotrophy and hernia recurrence. The aim of the study is to determine whether rTAPP of complex inguinal hernias is associated with a lower surgical stress response and a lower risk of postoperative complications compared to laparoscopic TAPP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Inguinal Laparoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic TAPP

Repair of primary unilateral and bilateral hernias with robotic technology

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robotic TAPP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robotic TAPP consists of four different procedures. Part 2 and 3 will be the same for both procedures and will consist of hernia reduction and preparation of the preperitoneal space where the mesh is placed (part 2), mesh placement and suturing of the peritoneum (part 3). Part 1 consists of docking of the robot and port placement and part 4 consists of de-docking and skin closure

Laparoscopic TAPP

Repair of primary unilateral and bilateral hernias with laparoscopic repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic TAPP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic TAPP consists of four different procedures. Part 2 and 3 will be the same for both procedures and will consist of hernia reduction and preparation of the preperitoneal space where the mesh is placed (part 2), mesh placement and suturing of the peritoneum (part 3). Part 1 consists of port placement only and part 4 consists of skin closure only.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic TAPP

Robotic TAPP consists of four different procedures. Part 2 and 3 will be the same for both procedures and will consist of hernia reduction and preparation of the preperitoneal space where the mesh is placed (part 2), mesh placement and suturing of the peritoneum (part 3). Part 1 consists of docking of the robot and port placement and part 4 consists of de-docking and skin closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic TAPP

Laparoscopic TAPP consists of four different procedures. Part 2 and 3 will be the same for both procedures and will consist of hernia reduction and preparation of the preperitoneal space where the mesh is placed (part 2), mesh placement and suturing of the peritoneum (part 3). Part 1 consists of port placement only and part 4 consists of skin closure only.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA 1- 3
* Clinical or radiologic diagnosis of inguinal hernia (unilateral, bilateral, recurrent, inguinoscrotal)
* Eligible for a laparoscopic procedure
* Informed concent

Exclusion Criteria

* Incarcerated inguinal hernia requiring emergency surgery
* Pregnancy
* Patients with chronic pain due to arthritis, migraine or other illness requiring regular intake of pain relieve (paracetamol, NSAID etc)
* Active cancer
* History of psychiatric or additive disorder that prevent the patient from participating in the trial
* Co-existing inflammatory disease
* Co-existing immunological disease that requires medication of any kind
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sygehus Soenderjylland

Aabenraa, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12535413 (View on PubMed)

Podolsky D, Novitsky Y. Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):409-415. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32169186 (View on PubMed)

Huerta S, Timmerman C, Argo M, Favela J, Pham T, Kukreja S, Yan J, Zhu H. Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Predictors of Complications. J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31022677 (View on PubMed)

Valorenzos A, Nielsen KA, Kaiser K, Petersen SR, Helligso P, Dorfelt A, Lambertsen KL, Ellebaek MB, Nielsen MF. Inflammatory response and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (ROLAIS). Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 28;112(4):znaf074. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf074.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40277023 (View on PubMed)

Valorenzos AV, Nielsen KA, Kaiser K, Helligso P, Ellebaek MB, Dorfelt A, Petersen SR, Pedersen AK, Nielsen MF. Short-term outcomes and inflammatory stress response following laparoscopy or robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): study protocol for a prospective, randomized trial (ROLAIS). Trials. 2024 Aug 8;25(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08361-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39118135 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHS-MT Kir - 1 - 2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair TEP vs TAPP
NCT07108972 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA