Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
NCT ID: NCT06240858
Last Updated: 2024-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-01
2023-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes.
Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
QOL in Incarcerated Inguinal Hernias: TAPP Vs Open Repair
NCT02788812
A Comparative Study Between TAPP and Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Surgery
NCT07067281
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
NCT04211142
Self-Fixating Mesh Versus Mesh Fixation With Tissue Glue in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06412445
Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment - Lichtenstein Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty
NCT00642200
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAPP group
The TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair.
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.
The TAPP group used self-gripping mesh for laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair.
Lichtenstein group
The Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Lichtenstein hernia repair.
The Lichtenstein group used self-gripping mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.
The TAPP group used self-gripping mesh for laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair.
Lichtenstein hernia repair.
The Lichtenstein group used self-gripping mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a definite diagnosis of unilateral primary inguinal hernia.
* Patients and their families were informed about the study protocol and agreed to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with previous history of lower abdominal surgery.
* Patients with contraindications to anaesthesia.
* Patients with contraindications to laparoscopic surgery.
* Failure to follow up patients as scheduled.
* Patients with abdominal infections.
* Those who cannot tolerate general anaesthesia surgery due to serious coagulation disorders, cardiopulmonary disorders, etc.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Second Hospital of Jilin University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Second Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
(2022) Annual Audit No. (175)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.