A Comparative Study Between TAPP and Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07067281
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-01
2025-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146
QOL in Incarcerated Inguinal Hernias: TAPP Vs Open Repair
NCT02788812
Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
NCT06240858
Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique
NCT05504122
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair- Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Totally Extra Peritoneal (TEP)
NCT00687375
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Worldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach.
Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using Trans abdominal Pre peritoneal procedure(TAPP) \& Lichtenstein techniques. Primary outcomes are Operative time , Surgical site infection , Seroma , post operative ileus , bowel injury ,mesh infection , recurrence and quality of life .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery using as conventional method
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo open Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for inguinal hernia under regional (spinal) or local anesthesia. A standard polypropylene mesh will be placed over the inguinal canal posterior wall and fixed to the inguinal ligament and conjoint tendon using non-absorbable sutures. The procedure is performed through a single inguinal incision. Patients will receive perioperative analgesia and standard postoperative care. This technique serves as the control group, reflecting conventional open hernia repair.
Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty
Open surgical repair of inguinal hernia using a tension-free mesh technique. A standard polypropylene mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and fixed with non-absorbable sutures under spinal or local anesthesia. This is a conventional method widely used in open hernia surgery.
TAPP Repair
Participants in this arm will undergo laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia under general anesthesia. A standard 3-port laparoscopic technique will be used. After accessing the preperitoneal space, a large polypropylene mesh will be placed to cover the myopectineal orifice and fixed using tacks or glue. The peritoneal flap will be closed using absorbable sutures or staplers. Patients will receive standard laparoscopic postoperative care. This arm represents the minimally invasive surgical option.
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair
Laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair performed under general anesthesia. Three ports are used to access the abdominal cavity, and a peritoneal flap is created to place a large polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh is fixed with tacks or glue, and the peritoneal flap is closed. This minimally invasive method is designed to reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty
Open surgical repair of inguinal hernia using a tension-free mesh technique. A standard polypropylene mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and fixed with non-absorbable sutures under spinal or local anesthesia. This is a conventional method widely used in open hernia surgery.
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair
Laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair performed under general anesthesia. Three ports are used to access the abdominal cavity, and a peritoneal flap is created to place a large polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh is fixed with tacks or glue, and the peritoneal flap is closed. This minimally invasive method is designed to reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
5 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GSVM Medical College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shubham Chaubey
Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shubham Chaubey, Principle investigator, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE KANPUR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ganesh Shankar vidhyapthi Memorial Medical college kanpur
Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EC/BMHR/2024/34
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.