A Comparative Study Between TAPP and Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07067281

Last Updated: 2025-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is comperative study between TAPP And Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery.The Lichtenstein tension-free open hernioplasty involves placing a tailored polypropylene mesh over the inguinal canal defect, secured to ligament and oblique fascia under local/regional anesthesia.Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair uses laparoscopic access via three ports (umbilicus and bilateral midclavicular lines), incises and closes a peritoneal flap, and places a large mesh in the preperitoneal space. Compression between these two procedure in terms of intraoperative ,postoperative complications and Long term follow up for recurrence of Hernia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Comperative study between TAPP And Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery.

Worldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach.

Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using Trans abdominal Pre peritoneal procedure(TAPP) \& Lichtenstein techniques. Primary outcomes are Operative time , Surgical site infection , Seroma , post operative ileus , bowel injury ,mesh infection , recurrence and quality of life .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia Inguinal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized parallel Group,Active trial with computer generated randomization
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery using as conventional method

Participants randomized to this arm will undergo open Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for inguinal hernia under regional (spinal) or local anesthesia. A standard polypropylene mesh will be placed over the inguinal canal posterior wall and fixed to the inguinal ligament and conjoint tendon using non-absorbable sutures. The procedure is performed through a single inguinal incision. Patients will receive perioperative analgesia and standard postoperative care. This technique serves as the control group, reflecting conventional open hernia repair.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open surgical repair of inguinal hernia using a tension-free mesh technique. A standard polypropylene mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and fixed with non-absorbable sutures under spinal or local anesthesia. This is a conventional method widely used in open hernia surgery.

TAPP Repair

Participants in this arm will undergo laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia under general anesthesia. A standard 3-port laparoscopic technique will be used. After accessing the preperitoneal space, a large polypropylene mesh will be placed to cover the myopectineal orifice and fixed using tacks or glue. The peritoneal flap will be closed using absorbable sutures or staplers. Patients will receive standard laparoscopic postoperative care. This arm represents the minimally invasive surgical option.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair performed under general anesthesia. Three ports are used to access the abdominal cavity, and a peritoneal flap is created to place a large polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh is fixed with tacks or glue, and the peritoneal flap is closed. This minimally invasive method is designed to reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty

Open surgical repair of inguinal hernia using a tension-free mesh technique. A standard polypropylene mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and fixed with non-absorbable sutures under spinal or local anesthesia. This is a conventional method widely used in open hernia surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair

Laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair performed under general anesthesia. Three ports are used to access the abdominal cavity, and a peritoneal flap is created to place a large polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh is fixed with tacks or glue, and the peritoneal flap is closed. This minimally invasive method is designed to reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GSVM Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shubham Chaubey

Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shubham Chaubey, Principle investigator, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE KANPUR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ganesh Shankar vidhyapthi Memorial Medical college kanpur

Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC/BMHR/2024/34

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair TEP vs TAPP
NCT07108972 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA