Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia?

NCT ID: NCT06070207

Last Updated: 2024-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate.

One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation.

There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. These studies are generally planned for unilateral hernias. It is a controversial issue among surgeons that the possibility of mesh migration is higher in bilateral hernias since there is a larger dissection area. This discussion is the starting point of this study. There were no studies in the literature regarding mesh fixation in bilateral inguinal hernias. The aim of this study is to compare bilateral inguinal hernia patients with and without mesh fixation in the eTEP technique in terms of both mesh migration and clinical features.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migration of Implant Pain Postoperative Complications Relapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TEP Group

In 20 patients; Bilateral inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the TEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides. During the surgery, the mesh will not be fixed. Patients whose pain scores (VAS score) are measured on the first postoperative day and who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined, their pain scores will be measured (VAS score) and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TEP group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the TEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides.

eTEP Group

In 20 patients; Bilateral inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides. During the surgery, the mesh will not be fixed. Patients whose pain scores (VAS score) are measured on the first postoperative day and who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined, their pain scores will be measured (VAS score) and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

eTEP group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TEP group

Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the TEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

eTEP group

Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with bilateral inguinal hernias.
* Patients aged 18-65.

Exclusion Criteria

* Younger than 18 years, and older than 65 years
* Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias,
* Recurrent hernias.
* Patients with unilateral inguinal hernias.
* Patients who are contraindicated to receive general anesthesia.
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Van Training and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Science Van Training and Research Hospital

Van, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yildirim MB, Sahiner IT. The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study. Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02587-w. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35286511 (View on PubMed)

Claus CMP, Rocha GM, Campos ACL, Paulin JAN, Coelho JCU. Mesh Displacement After Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair With No Fixation. JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep;21(3):e2017.00033. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00033.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28904521 (View on PubMed)

Claus CM, Rocha GM, Campos AC, Bonin EA, Dimbarre D, Loureiro MP, Coelho JC. Prospective, randomized and controlled study of mesh displacement after laparoscopic inguinal repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1134-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4314-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26092029 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

55555555555

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair TEP vs TAPP
NCT07108972 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA