Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair

NCT ID: NCT05320055

Last Updated: 2023-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of results after rTARUP and lap IPOM in patients with small- and medium-sized ventral hernia. Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTARUP or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral and incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural catheter, secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, and length of stay. All patients underwent elective surgery and were followed for 30 days postoperatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTARUP or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral and incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural catheter, secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, and length of stay. All patients underwent elective surgery and were followed for 30 days postoperatively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Ventral

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IPOM

receiving laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair

robotic repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair

rTARUP

recieving robotic assited retromuscular repair

robotic repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

robotic repair

robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patients undergoing elective minimally invasive repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral or incisional hernia repairs at one academic hernia center with an unrestricted patient referral.

Consecutive patients undergoing IPOM (December 1st, 2017 - December 1st, 2018) and rTARUPrRetrorectus (March 1st, 2021 - June 1st, 2021).

Exclusion Criteria

* open repairs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bispebjerg Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mette Willaume

Staff specialist, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mette Willaume, phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN, Jensen KK. Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias. Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36109358 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IPOM vs TARUP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.