Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT ID: NCT05320055
Last Updated: 2023-08-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
59 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-01
2021-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05839587
Outcomes of Open Versus Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Posterior Component Separation in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair
NCT05195957
Robotic Trans-Abdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (r-TARUP)
NCT05423574
rTARUP: Long-term Analysis
NCT05939206
Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05233020
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IPOM
receiving laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair
robotic repair
robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair
rTARUP
recieving robotic assited retromuscular repair
robotic repair
robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
robotic repair
robotic assisted retromuscular hernia repair
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Consecutive patients undergoing IPOM (December 1st, 2017 - December 1st, 2018) and rTARUPrRetrorectus (March 1st, 2021 - June 1st, 2021).
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bispebjerg Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mette Willaume
Staff specialist, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mette Willaume, phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN, Jensen KK. Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias. Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IPOM vs TARUP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.