Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
111 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-22
2024-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic Utility for Surgical Treatment of Umbilical Hernias
NCT02975414
Robotic Trans-Abdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (r-TARUP)
NCT05423574
Robotic Utility for Surgical Treatment of Groin Hernias
NCT02975401
Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05320055
Outcomes of Open Versus Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Posterior Component Separation in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair
NCT05195957
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Muysoms, F., et al., Robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP): observational study on the operative time during the learning curve. Hernia, 2018. 22(6): p. 1101-1111.
Muysoms, F., et al., Observational study with one year follow-up on robotic assisted retro-rectus ventral hernia repair (RTARUP) with a self-fixating mesh. Br J Surg, 2021. 108(Suppl 8).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTARUP
robotic assisted transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic repair
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Lateral approach to the retromuscular plane/lateral single docking
* Use of Progrip self-fixating mesh
Exclusion Criteria
* eTEP approach to the retromuscular plane
* Use of any other mesh than Progrip self-fixating mesh.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Filip Muysoms
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AZ Maria Middelares
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
rTARUP FU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.