Feasibility of Re-TREPP in Patients With a Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Previous TREPP Repair

NCT ID: NCT03411226

Last Updated: 2018-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-27

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Trans REctussheath PrePeritoneal (TREPP) mesh repair was introduced in 2006 to decrease the risk of postoperative inguinal pain in hernia surgery. For the repair of a recurrent inguinal hernia after a primary TREPP an alternative open anterior route (Lichtenstein) may seem the most logical option, but coincides with an increased risk of chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a second TREPP procedure to repair a recurrent inguinal hernia after an initial TREPP repair. The hypothesis was that the technique is possible and does not lead to an increased risk of postoperative pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Since the development and introduction of TREPP in 2006, TREPP has been the standard operation technique for all patients who present in St. Jansdal Hospital with an inguinal hernia. The electronic patient files of all consecutive patients who were operated at the St Jansdal hospital via TREPP between January 2006 and December 2013 were retrospectively investigated. This patient list was retrieved by an electronic search using the assigned operation codes. Adult patients who had developed a recurrent inguinal hernia and had undergone a re-TREPP were included in this study. A case report form was filled in for each patient that underwent a re-TREPP. Baseline data such as operation time, Body Mass Index (BMI), operation technique, number of conversions, aetiology of the recurrence, type of anesthesia and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification were retrospectively reviewed through patient files and operation reports. Co-morbidities were extracted from the files. Information on short term complications was taken from the notes of telephone consultation 2 and 30 days postoperatively, which is the local standard protocol for follow-up. Patients were invited for a long-term follow-up (\>30 days postoperative) at the outpatient department for physical examination, or they were visited at home by the investigator. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who were included for a long term follow-up. A case report form was used for each patient, in order to standardize the investigation. All patients were asked if they experienced any pain or discomfort. If there was pain, the Visual Analogue Scale and Pain Disability Index questionnaire were filled in. All patients were asked if sexual complaints occurred since the operation. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who were clinically evaluated. Recurrent inguinal hernia was defined as a reappearance of the inguinal hernia, diagnosed by physical examination (a reducible bulge with positive Valsalva).

This was a retrospective case series. Since the numbers were small, no statistical analysis was performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

re-TREPP

Patients who presented with a recurrent inguinal hernia after previous TREPP repair.

re-TREPP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

repeated hernia repair via the TREPP technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

re-TREPP

repeated hernia repair via the TREPP technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients who had developed a recurrent inguinal hernia and had undergone a re-TREPP.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children (age \<18 years)
* Exclusion criterium for long term follow up: no informed consent obtained.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandra Persoon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexandra Persoon

Drs. A.M. Persoon

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giel G Koning, MSc, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

St Jansdal Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

01012006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT02233465 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2