Prognostic Significance of CMR-Confirmed Infarct in MINOCA Patients from Sweden and Australia
NCT ID: NCT06889428
Last Updated: 2025-03-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project will utilize DataSHIELD, an innovative platform that enables pooled statistical analysis of sensitive data without compromising individual-level privacy. This multicentre, comprehensive study will have a major impact on contemporary practice. It will be able to provide the significance of MINOCA diagnosis (myocardial scar on MRI), alongside identifying clinical factors associated with its occurrence and its correlation with long-term outcomes.
This is crucial for informing clinical guidelines, policy decisions around reimbursement for MRI, and developing effective clinical trials to enhance the management of MRI-confirmed MINOCA patients
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biomarkers of Inflammation and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries
NCT06446895
Stockholm Myocardial Infarction With Normal Coronaries (SMINC)-2 Study on Diagnosis Made by Cardiac MRI
NCT02318498
Etiologic Mechanisms, Myocardial Changes and Prognosis of Patients With MINOCA
NCT04538924
CMR in Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries
NCT06502899
Prevalence of Myocarditis in Patients Suspected Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries
NCT06966531
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suspected MINOCA with CMR
Patients who have undergone a CMR procedure as part of their care at the time of acute presentation with MI.
CMR
No CMR
Suspected MINOCA without CMR
Patients who did not undergo a CMR procedure as part of their care at the time of acute presentation with MI.
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients with confirmed MINOCA
Suspected MINOCA patients who have received a diagnosis of MI following CMR
CMR
No CMR
Patients with other CMR diagnosis
Suspected MINOCA patients who did not receive a diagnosis of MI following CMR
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CMR
No CMR
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Cardiac MRI - at least within 3 months of acute presentation
Exclusion Criteria
2. Follow-up data not available (ie international visitors).
3. Suspicion of an alternative cause for presentation (such as sepsis, pulmonary embolus, primary cardiac arrhythmia or trauma) which would not be consistent with the label of MINOCA.
4. Clinically evident non-ischemic diagnoses - myocarditis, Takotsubo, other cardiomyopathies prior to CMR
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
University of Adelaide
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sivabaskari Pasupathy
Principal Investigator (Research Fellow)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Beltrame, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Adelaide
Bertil Lindahl
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Uppsala University
Sivabaskari Pasupathy, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Adelaide
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HREC/15/TQEH/252 - SWEET
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.