Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in the Greek Population

NCT ID: NCT04186676

Last Updated: 2024-02-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The MINOCA-GR registry will be the first nationwide study aiming to obtain data regarding prevalence, demographics, clinical profile, previous anginal status, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, management and outcomes in patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries. An additional purpose of the registry is to highlight, for the first time worldwide to the best of the investigator's knowledge, the role of cardiac computed tomography angiography for risk stratification and personalized therapeutic approach in MINOCA patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MINOCA occurs in 5%-10% of all patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and these patients are younger and more often women in comparison with patients with AMI and obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood, although several different mechanisms have been proposed, including plaque disruption, spasm, thromboembolism, dissection, microvascular dysfunction and ischemic myocardial injury attributable to supply/demand mismatch. In most, but not all, studies of prognosis, MINOCA patients had better outcomes than their AMI counterparts with coronary artery disease but faced a high risk for recurrent events, with one study finding that 25% of patients with MINOCA experience angina in the following year. Optimal patient management requires early diagnosis as well as understanding which of the myriad of mechanisms (atherosclerotic or non-atherosclerotic as well as a combination of both) may be underlying the initial diagnosis. The effects of secondary preventive treatments proven beneficial in patients with classical type I AMI are unknown in MINOCA patients; randomized clinical trials, and large observational studies, as well, evaluating different treatments in MINOCA patients do not exist. Hence, evidence-based guidelines for treatment of MINOCA are lacking. Elucidating the associations between different treatments and outcome may also increase the understanding of underlying mechanisms of MINOCA. The underlying mechanisms strongly determine prognosis and more importantly, therapeutic interventions as well as their success.

Likewise, multimodality imaging could provide new insights into the management of MINOCA patients. The current research reveals the utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for diagnosis and risk stratification of suspected MINOCA patients but at the same time shows how much more information is needed to further characterize risk and ultimately develop therapeutic approaches to alter its natural history. Computed tomography has a suite of strengths including diagnosis of CAD, identification of plaque characteristics, morphology and perfusion data, and even possibly delayed enhancement; its ability to detect nonobstructive coronary disease by way of visualizing not only the lumen but also plaques is very helpful in our efforts trying to understand microvascular disease, plaque erosion, and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary artery. Furthermore, up until recently, high-risk plaque features and lesion specific ischemia are thought to be not directly related. However, emerging evidence suggests a possible relationship between high-risk plaque features, particularly low attenuation plaque volume and positive remodeling, with lesion specific ischemia by fractional flow reserve. Such relationship is independent of degree of luminal stenosis. As a result of the above, it is obvious that Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) may have a potential role in some selected patients with MINOCA, depending on their clinical picture and stability.

Regarding Greece, the MINOCA-GR registry will be the first prospectively enrolling medical database of this magnitude.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myocardial Infarction Non-Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis Ischemic Heart Disease Angina Pectoris Coronary Microvascular Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MINOCA patients

Prevalence, demographics, clinical profile, previous anginal status, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, management and outcomes in consecutive patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries admitted to study clinical sites

MINOCA registry

Intervention Type OTHER

Prevalence, demographics, clinical profile, anginal status, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, management and outcomes

CCTA Phenotypes

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

1. Complete normal coronary arteries
2. Diffuse non-obstructive coronary artery disease
3. Non-obstructive high-risk plaques
4. Myocardial bridges

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MINOCA registry

Prevalence, demographics, clinical profile, anginal status, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, management and outcomes

Intervention Type OTHER

CCTA Phenotypes

1. Complete normal coronary arteries
2. Diffuse non-obstructive coronary artery disease
3. Non-obstructive high-risk plaques
4. Myocardial bridges

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients older than 18 years
2. Patients without known history of coronary artery disease
3. Patients with acute coronary syndrome with and/or without ST-segment elevation who underwent coronary angiography within 24h after onset of the disease
4. Absence of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (normal coronary arteries or plaques \<50% stenosis) based on the results of invasive coronary angiography
5. Subject has provided written informed consent
6. Subject is willing to comply with study follow-up requirements

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients \< 18 years old at time of coronary angiography
2. Patients with a previous history of coronary artery disease and/or prior revascularization
3. Patients with serious concurrent disease and life expectancy of \< 1 year
4. Patients who refuse to give written consent for participation in the study
5. In the investigator's opinion, subject will not be able to comply with the follow-up requirements
6. Subject is pregnant and/or breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant during the study
7. Subject has a known allergy to contrast agent that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

New York University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

AHEPA University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

George Giannakoulas

Associate Professor, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Georgios Giannakoulas, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

General Hospital of Veroia

Véroia, Imathia, Greece

Site Status

National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

AHEPA University Hospital

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Greece

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rampidis GP, Benetos G, Benz DC, Giannopoulos AA, Buechel RR. A guide for Gensini Score calculation. Atherosclerosis. 2019 Aug;287:181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 10. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31104809 (View on PubMed)

Agewall S, Beltrame JF, Reynolds HR, Niessner A, Rosano G, Caforio AL, De Caterina R, Zimarino M, Roffi M, Kjeldsen K, Atar D, Kaski JC, Sechtem U, Tornvall P; WG on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur Heart J. 2017 Jan 14;38(3):143-153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw149. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28158518 (View on PubMed)

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD; Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30153967 (View on PubMed)

Tamis-Holland JE, Jneid H, Reynolds HR, Agewall S, Brilakis ES, Brown TM, Lerman A, Cushman M, Kumbhani DJ, Arslanian-Engoren C, Bolger AF, Beltrame JF; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Apr 30;139(18):e891-e908. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000670.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30913893 (View on PubMed)

Grodzinsky A, Arnold SV, Gosch K, Spertus JA, Foody JM, Beltrame J, Maddox TM, Parashar S, Kosiborod M. Angina Frequency After Acute Myocardial Infarction In Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2015;1(2):92-99. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv014. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28239487 (View on PubMed)

Ahmadi A, Leipsic J, Ovrehus KA, Gaur S, Bagiella E, Ko B, Dey D, LaRocca G, Jensen JM, Botker HE, Achenbach S, De Bruyne B, Norgaard BL, Narula J. Lesion-Specific and Vessel-Related Determinants of Fractional Flow Reserve Beyond Coronary Artery Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Apr;11(4):521-530. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.020. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29311033 (View on PubMed)

Nordenskjold AM, Lagerqvist B, Baron T, Jernberg T, Hadziosmanovic N, Reynolds HR, Tornvall P, Lindahl B. Reinfarction in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): Coronary Findings and Prognosis. Am J Med. 2019 Mar;132(3):335-346. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30367850 (View on PubMed)

van Rosendael AR, Shaw LJ, Xie JX, Dimitriu-Leen AC, Smit JM, Scholte AJ, van Werkhoven JM, Callister TQ, DeLago A, Berman DS, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Al-Mallah MH, Budoff MJ, Kaufmann PA, Raff G, Chinnaiyan K, Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Villines TC, Kim YJ, Feuchtner G, Lin FY, Jones EC, Pontone G, Andreini D, Marques H, Rubinshtein R, Achenbach S, Dunning A, Gomez M, Hindoyan N, Gransar H, Leipsic J, Narula J, Min JK, Bax JJ. Superior Risk Stratification With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Comprehensive Atherosclerotic Risk Score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Oct;12(10):1987-1997. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.024. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30660516 (View on PubMed)

Benetos G, Buechel RR, Goncalves M, Benz DC, von Felten E, Rampidis GP, Clerc OF, Messerli M, Giannopoulos AA, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA, Grani C. Coronary artery volume index: a novel CCTA-derived predictor for cardiovascular events. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;36(4):713-722. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01750-2. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31894527 (View on PubMed)

Benz DC, Benetos G, Rampidis G, von Felten E, Bakula A, Sustar A, Kudura K, Messerli M, Fuchs TA, Gebhard C, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA, Buechel RR. Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31974008 (View on PubMed)

Rampidis GP, Kampaktsis PNu, Kouskouras K, Samaras A, Benetos G, Giannopoulos AAlpha, Karamitsos T, Kallifatidis A, Samaras A, Vogiatzis I, Hadjimiltiades S, Ziakas A, Buechel RR, Gebhard C, Smilowitz NR, Toutouzas K, Tsioufis K, Prassopoulos P, Karvounis H, Reynolds H, Giannakoulas G. Role of cardiac CT in the diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification of patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): rationale and design of the MINOCA-GR study. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e054698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054698.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35110321 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIP_001_MINOCA_GR_27.11.2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.