Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT ID: NCT06882161
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-15
2024-12-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, fifty patients were initially evaluated. After conducting clinical and radiographic assessments, twenty patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were selected in accordance with the sample size calculation. Each patient received an explanation of every procedure, and informed consent was obtained. These twenty individuals were subsequently divided randomly into two distinct groups (ten in each):
Group I: Ten patients received polyoxymethylene (acetal resin) partial dentures designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. Group II: Ten patients received polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technology.
All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Clinical assessments were conducted by assessing the pocket depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) at denture insertion, three months later and six months later. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess abutment alveolar bone height change at the time of denture placement, after three months, and after six months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acetal resin partial dentures
ten patients received acetal resin partial dentures designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technology
Acetal resin
Effect of acetal resin versus Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures on abutment teeth supporting structures in Kennedy class I mandibular partial denture cases
PEEK partial dentures
ten patients received polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technology.
Acetal resin
Effect of acetal resin versus Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures on abutment teeth supporting structures in Kennedy class I mandibular partial denture cases
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acetal resin
Effect of acetal resin versus Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures on abutment teeth supporting structures in Kennedy class I mandibular partial denture cases
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient's residual ridges should be covered with healthy mucosa.
* Their salivary flow and viscosity for all within normal limits.
* The patients are cooperative and ready to be called back as necessary.
* had a Class I Angle's ridge relation
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation.
* Patients with parafunctional habits.
* Patients with ulcerated or inflamed mucosa.
40 Years
50 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Al-Azhar University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yasmin Seif Eldeen Zidan
Yasmin S. Zidan
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yasmin S Zidan, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lecturer at faculty of dental medicine for girls , Al-Azhar University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Al-Azhar University
Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P-PD-14-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.