Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force

NCT ID: NCT03777423

Last Updated: 2018-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aiming to evaluate the biting force of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework partial dentures compared to that of cobalt-chromium ones in mandibular Kennedy class I edentulous cases hoping that polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework removable partial dentures can improve the patient masticatory efficiency .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mandibular Prosthesis User

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PEEK framework partial dentures

High performance ketone polymers introduced lately.These polymer-based frameworks provide better esthetics, higher elasticity, lighter in weight, have low water sorption and solubility, and are easily repaired and reproduced.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PEEK framework partial dentures

Intervention Type DEVICE

Polymer-based framework recently introduced made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.

Cobalt-chromium framework partial dentures

it is considered the gold standard framework. These frameworks are less bulky with high strength, conduct heat and electricity well, and have good durability. some disadvantages include hypersensitivity, adverse tissue reactions and bad aesthetics.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cobalt- chromium framework partial dentures

Intervention Type DEVICE

It's a bio-compatible metal used in thin sections so less bulky, provide high strength and stiffness ,conduct heat and cold for a more natural experience, enable designs that minimize the covering of the gingival margins, allow for a stable denture base, and resistance to corrosion.Drawbacks of metal frameworks can include hypersensitivity, aesthetics because of metal metal display, oral galvanism, adverse tissue reactions, osteolysis of abutment teeth, and biofilm production

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PEEK framework partial dentures

Polymer-based framework recently introduced made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cobalt- chromium framework partial dentures

It's a bio-compatible metal used in thin sections so less bulky, provide high strength and stiffness ,conduct heat and cold for a more natural experience, enable designs that minimize the covering of the gingival margins, allow for a stable denture base, and resistance to corrosion.Drawbacks of metal frameworks can include hypersensitivity, aesthetics because of metal metal display, oral galvanism, adverse tissue reactions, osteolysis of abutment teeth, and biofilm production

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

-Kennedy class 1 partially edentulous subjects indicated for framework partial denture

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncooperative patients
* Bad oral hygiene patients
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amr Hatim Mohammed

Principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of oral and dental medincine Cairo university

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Amr Ha Mohammed, Master

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +201001600625

Email: [email protected]

haytham Mo Talaat, master

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +201210520141

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hassan Ahmed

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Jammali ZM. Clinical Evaluation of Maximum Bite Force in Patient with Heat Cure acrylic and Flexible Partial Dentures. Medical Journal of Babylon. 2017;14(3):509-17.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2018-11-29

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id