Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT ID: NCT03714074
Last Updated: 2018-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-31
2021-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248
Patient Satisfaction , Prosthetic Complications and Clinical Outcomes of PEEK Composite Versus Titanium Zirconium
NCT06111391
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomized Controlled Trial., Parallel Design., Allocation ratio 1:1
This study will be carried out on patients enrolled from the Outpatient clinic in the Fixed Prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
First Visit: ( Diagnosis and records Making)
Patients will be recalled to the outpatient clinic, treatment will be discussed with the patient in details with the expected timeline and full duration of the treatment and a signed consent will be obtained from the patient.
Thorough medical history will be taken from the patient to identify any causes preventing the patient from undergoing the surgery and to eliminate any risk factors. Primary alginate impressions and bite registration will be made to obtain mounted study casts for case study, intra-oral photographs will be taken and the patient will be asked for a CBCT for the area of interest to be studied and discussed .
Second visit: (Implant insertion)
The patient will be locally anaesthetized using Articaine 4% (Septanest, France) , and patient will be left for 5 -10 minutes after which he/she will be examined for objective/subjective signs. If the patient shows any signs of pain or discomfort during examination, another carpule will be administrated.
A full thickness flap will be opened at the surgical site using #15 blade with a sub-crestal incision to expose the crest of the bone and two vertical releasing incisions. The flap will be reflected using a mucoperiosteal elevator. Sequential drilling will be performed according to the desired implant diameter using the drills provided by the surgical kit and the implant will be inserted manually into the osteotomy using the ratchet wrench and driver. The initial stability of the implant will be tested with the torque wrench and the implant opening will be closed using a cover screw. A peri-apical radiograph will be taken to confirm the implant position and assure it is away from vital structures by 2mm.
Flap will be repositioned using a tissue forceps and suturing will be done to secure the flap in position using a 4-0 silk suture material.
Patient will be given the post-operative instructions and hygiene measures and Augmentin 1gm / 12 hours for 7 days and analgesics ( Brufen 400 mg when needed)
Third visit: (Re-entry)
After three to four months, the patient will be recalled for the 2nd stage surgery and implant exposure. Peri-apical radiographs and intra-oral photographs will be taken. The patient will be anaesthetized and the implant will be exposed by a crestal incision using a #15 blade. The cover screw will be replaced with a healing collar which will be left for 2 weeks.
Fourth visit: (Impression making):
After 2 weeks the healing collar will be removed and the transfer copings will be placed for impression making, after setting the impression will be disinfected and send to the laboratory along with the implant replicas for fabrication of the abutments and the prosthesis. The healing collar is replaced till the next visit.
Fifth visit: ( Delivery of the final restoration)
The healing collar will be removed and the abutment and final restoration will be placed over the implant, a peri-apical radiographs will be taken to ensure tightening of the abutment screw and absence of any gaps. Patient will be given oral hygiene instructions
Relevant care/interventions that will be permitted or prohibited during the trial:
* Patients will receive antibiotics and pain killers after the implant insertion
* Patients will be educated with proper hygiene measures and motivated to keep good oral hygiene
* Patients will be advised to stop/ decrease the frequency of smoking to maximum one pack per day and will be prohibited from drinking alcohol.
Primary outcome:
Patients' satisfaction will be measured used the Visual analogue scale; a numerical scale from 0-10 with 0 being the lowest value (dis-satisfied) and 10 being the highest (highly satisfied). The patient will be asked to fill the VAS at time of crown delivery (0) , 3months, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcome: will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months
1. Bleeding on Probing Visual Inspection combined with Plastic Periodontal Probe 2 Binary (Yes or No)
2. Probing Depth Graduated periodontal probe 2 Millimeters (m.m)
3. Plaque accumulation Visually 2 Binary (Yes \& No)
Tertiary outcome:
Will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months using the standardized peri-apical radiographs and image super-imposition on the software to measure the difference in bony crest height.
Where 0= time of prosthesis delievery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEEK abutment
PEEK abutment restored with PEEK superstructure
PEEK implant abutment
Implants will be restored with abutments made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Zirconia abutment
zirconia abutment restored with PEEK superstructure
Zirconia abutment
Imolants will be restored with zirconia abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEEK implant abutment
Implants will be restored with abutments made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Zirconia abutment
Imolants will be restored with zirconia abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients able to read and sign the informed consent.
3. Medically free patients or with controlled systemic condition.
4. Missing tooth/teeth in the esthetic zone
5. Minimum bucco-lingual bone width of 6mm, evaluated using CBCT.
6. Good oral hygiene and favourable occlusion
7. Cooperative and motivated Patients.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Illiterate, unable of comprehending or signing the informed consent form
3. Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. Diabetes or hypertension) or debilitated health condition
4. Pregnancy
5. Poor oral hygiene or unfavorable occlusion
6. Uncooperative, not willing to return for follow up visits
7. Insufficient bone quantity or quality for implant placement
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amr Ali youssef
Assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amina Zaki, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2018-09-27
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.