Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT ID: NCT06647199
Last Updated: 2024-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-01
2023-07-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IMMEDIATE IMPLANT With Different Types of Membranes
NCT06657651
Immediate Implant Placement With Different Materials of Customized Healing Abutment for Guiding Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing in Posterior Teeth
NCT06645444
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524
Titanium Versus Soft Metal CAD/CAM Frameworks for All-on-4 Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06114966
Radiographic Evaluation of All-on-4 Implant Prosthesis With Different Materials and Bar Construction Techniques
NCT06071689
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The participants enrolled in the current study were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the material and technique of their mandibular overdenture bases. All participants were delivered new sets of conventional complete dentures implied bilateral balanced occlusal scheme. They were well instructed to wear their dentures regularly for 3 months prior to implant installment ascribed to enhancement of the neuromuscular adaptation. For each patient, the mandibular denture was duplicated with clear auto- polymerizing acrylic resin to fabricate the mandibular surgical template with gutta percha markers. By employing CBCT, all patients were scanned conforming to the dual scan protocol .The implants were installed virtually parallel to each other and perpendicular to the occlusal plane at the areas of canines and lateral incisors .This was carried out using 3D image planning software . The surgical stent with four sleeves was constructed by rapid prototyping .It was placed over the proposed implant locations.Four dental implants were surgically placed in the anterior region of the mandible.Three months afterward, the mandibular impression was registered. The primary impression was recorded and poured to gain the primary cast. Upon that primary cast, a closed custom tray was constructed. The positioner attachments were screwed to the implants, the processing caps and metal housings were secured over them. The custom tray was border molded. By using silicon impression material , the definitive impression was made at the abutment level. The processing caps and the metal housings were removed from the impression which was being poured by extra hard scannable dental stone to obtain the master cast. Maxillomandibular relations were registered .This was accomplished with mandibular conventional record blocks opposed by the existing maxillary complete denture. Semi anatomical acrylic teeth were arranged employing bilateral balanced occlusion .The waxed overdentures were tried in the patient's mouth. According to the mandibular denture base material and processing technique of the prostheses, the subjects were divided into three groups: The first group (I) included 10 participants whose mandibular overdentures were fabricated by milling pre-polymerized poly ether ether ketone PEEK discs (CAD/CAM PEEK MODs, the second group(II) included 10 participants whose mandibular overdentures were constructed by milling prepolymerised PMMA resin discs (CAD/CAM PMMA MODs), while the third group(III) included 10 participants received conventionally constructed heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate mandibular PMMA overdentures (conventional PMMA MOD).All needed adjustments were executed at the insertion visit. This is to assure appropriate border extension, proper denture base fit, even occlusal contact besides patient comfort. The female housing attachment was picked up to the fitting surface of the mandibular overdenture bases using self-cure acrylic resin. The white processing cap was removed and replaced by a blue one. The mandibular overdentures were delivered to all participants according to their group.
Patients' evaluation Clinical evaluation Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque, bleeding, and gingival scores were assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI) and simplified gingival index (GI), respectively. These indices were evaluated at prosthesis insertion (T0), 3 months (T1) , 6 months(T3) and 12 month (T4) after insertion. A calibrated pressure-sensitive plastic periodontal probe was utilized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAD/CAM Milled PEEK
In the first group (CAD/CAM PEEK MODs), the mandibular master cast, mandibular trial denture, and maxillary denture were scanned using an intraoral digital scanner both separately while biting. The scanned data were saved in standard tessellation language (STL) file format and entered into the design software . The mandibular denture base and set-up were virtually designed. Based on the virtually created mandibular denture bases, the STL file of the designed denture base was imported into the milling machine to mill the prepolymerised PEEK discs to construct the CAD/CAM PEEK MOD base .
the plaque index (PI)
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
the bleeding index (BI)
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
simplified gingival index(GI),
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD
CAD/CAM milled PMMA
In the second group (CAD/CAM PMMA MODs), the STL file of the designed denture base was imported into the milling machine to mill the PMMA MOD base. The mandibular denture base and set-up were virtually designed. Based on the virtually created mandibular denture bases, the CAD/CAM PMMA MOD base was milled .Based on the scanned denture teeth, denture teeth were milled from tooth-coloured prepolymerized PMMA blocks, finished and polished, and then bonded with a methacrylate-based bonding agent into the PMMA milled base.
the plaque index (PI)
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
the bleeding index (BI)
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
simplified gingival index(GI),
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD
conventional PMMA MOD
the traditional heat-cured PMMA MOD was constructed. The waxed-up overdenture was processed in heat-cured PMMA resin using the compression mould technique.
the plaque index (PI)
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
the bleeding index (BI)
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
simplified gingival index(GI),
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
the plaque index (PI)
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
the bleeding index (BI)
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
simplified gingival index(GI),
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* all subjects complained about insufficient retention and stability pertained to their mandibular dentures at their presentation;
* they had enough quantity and quality of bone in the mandibular lateral and canine areas to support the standard implants (14 mm in length and 3.6 mm in diameter) as verified by CBCT;
* they had healthy keratinized mucosa and a class I maxillomandibular relationship; besides, they had enough interarch space.
Exclusion Criteria
* subjects having head and neck radiation therapy or using anticoagulant medication.
* Those who had a history of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, which could interfere with appropriate function,
* those who smoked heavily were also excluded.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fatma Ahmad El Waseef
Associate professor of prosthodontics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Mansoura
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.