Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures

NCT ID: NCT06647199

Last Updated: 2024-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The researchers will perform a parallel randomized, clinical trial involving completely edentulous healthy patients. Each participant will receive four dental implants in the anterior mandible. According to the processing technique and denture base material, the patients will be classified into three groups. Group I: involves CAD/CAM milled poly ether ether ketone PEEK overdentures, Group II: involves CAD/CAM milled PMMA overdentures and Group III :involves conventional heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate PMMA overdentures. All assessments were carried out at delivery, 6 moths and one year after overdenture insertion to clinically evaluate the preiimplant tissues. .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be conducted to compare three different mandibular implant- assisted complete overdentures. These overdentures were constructed from three different materials and techniques: CAD/CAM-milled poly ether ether ketone (CAD/CAM PEEK MOD), CAD/CAM-milled poly methyl methacrylate (CAD/CAM PMMA MOD), and conventional heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate (conventional PMMA MOD) to clinically evaluate the preiimplant tissues.

The participants enrolled in the current study were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the material and technique of their mandibular overdenture bases. All participants were delivered new sets of conventional complete dentures implied bilateral balanced occlusal scheme. They were well instructed to wear their dentures regularly for 3 months prior to implant installment ascribed to enhancement of the neuromuscular adaptation. For each patient, the mandibular denture was duplicated with clear auto- polymerizing acrylic resin to fabricate the mandibular surgical template with gutta percha markers. By employing CBCT, all patients were scanned conforming to the dual scan protocol .The implants were installed virtually parallel to each other and perpendicular to the occlusal plane at the areas of canines and lateral incisors .This was carried out using 3D image planning software . The surgical stent with four sleeves was constructed by rapid prototyping .It was placed over the proposed implant locations.Four dental implants were surgically placed in the anterior region of the mandible.Three months afterward, the mandibular impression was registered. The primary impression was recorded and poured to gain the primary cast. Upon that primary cast, a closed custom tray was constructed. The positioner attachments were screwed to the implants, the processing caps and metal housings were secured over them. The custom tray was border molded. By using silicon impression material , the definitive impression was made at the abutment level. The processing caps and the metal housings were removed from the impression which was being poured by extra hard scannable dental stone to obtain the master cast. Maxillomandibular relations were registered .This was accomplished with mandibular conventional record blocks opposed by the existing maxillary complete denture. Semi anatomical acrylic teeth were arranged employing bilateral balanced occlusion .The waxed overdentures were tried in the patient's mouth. According to the mandibular denture base material and processing technique of the prostheses, the subjects were divided into three groups: The first group (I) included 10 participants whose mandibular overdentures were fabricated by milling pre-polymerized poly ether ether ketone PEEK discs (CAD/CAM PEEK MODs, the second group(II) included 10 participants whose mandibular overdentures were constructed by milling prepolymerised PMMA resin discs (CAD/CAM PMMA MODs), while the third group(III) included 10 participants received conventionally constructed heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate mandibular PMMA overdentures (conventional PMMA MOD).All needed adjustments were executed at the insertion visit. This is to assure appropriate border extension, proper denture base fit, even occlusal contact besides patient comfort. The female housing attachment was picked up to the fitting surface of the mandibular overdenture bases using self-cure acrylic resin. The white processing cap was removed and replaced by a blue one. The mandibular overdentures were delivered to all participants according to their group.

Patients' evaluation Clinical evaluation Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque, bleeding, and gingival scores were assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI) and simplified gingival index (GI), respectively. These indices were evaluated at prosthesis insertion (T0), 3 months (T1) , 6 months(T3) and 12 month (T4) after insertion. A calibrated pressure-sensitive plastic periodontal probe was utilized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peri-Implant Tissues

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CAD/CAM Milled PEEK

In the first group (CAD/CAM PEEK MODs), the mandibular master cast, mandibular trial denture, and maxillary denture were scanned using an intraoral digital scanner both separately while biting. The scanned data were saved in standard tessellation language (STL) file format and entered into the design software . The mandibular denture base and set-up were virtually designed. Based on the virtually created mandibular denture bases, the STL file of the designed denture base was imported into the milling machine to mill the prepolymerised PEEK discs to construct the CAD/CAM PEEK MOD base .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

the plaque index (PI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

the bleeding index (BI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

simplified gingival index(GI),

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD

CAD/CAM milled PMMA

In the second group (CAD/CAM PMMA MODs), the STL file of the designed denture base was imported into the milling machine to mill the PMMA MOD base. The mandibular denture base and set-up were virtually designed. Based on the virtually created mandibular denture bases, the CAD/CAM PMMA MOD base was milled .Based on the scanned denture teeth, denture teeth were milled from tooth-coloured prepolymerized PMMA blocks, finished and polished, and then bonded with a methacrylate-based bonding agent into the PMMA milled base.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

the plaque index (PI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

the bleeding index (BI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

simplified gingival index(GI),

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD

conventional PMMA MOD

the traditional heat-cured PMMA MOD was constructed. The waxed-up overdenture was processed in heat-cured PMMA resin using the compression mould technique.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

the plaque index (PI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

the bleeding index (BI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

simplified gingival index(GI),

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the plaque index (PI)

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the bleeding index (BI)

Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

simplified gingival index(GI),

Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Each selected subject fulfilled the following criteria:
* all subjects complained about insufficient retention and stability pertained to their mandibular dentures at their presentation;
* they had enough quantity and quality of bone in the mandibular lateral and canine areas to support the standard implants (14 mm in length and 3.6 mm in diameter) as verified by CBCT;
* they had healthy keratinized mucosa and a class I maxillomandibular relationship; besides, they had enough interarch space.

Exclusion Criteria

* Diabetes, osteoporosis, and immunological deficiency
* subjects having head and neck radiation therapy or using anticoagulant medication.
* Those who had a history of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, which could interfere with appropriate function,
* those who smoked heavily were also excluded.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatma Ahmad El Waseef

Associate professor of prosthodontics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Mansoura

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.