Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone

NCT ID: NCT03333889

Last Updated: 2017-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

P: Population: Patients requiring single unit implant restoration in esthetic zone I: Intervention: Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network abutment crown (VITA Enamic-VITA Zahnfabrik) C: Comparison: Lithium disilicate ceramic abutment crown (IPS e. max-Ivoclar Vivadent) O: Outcome: patient satisfaction , crestal bone loss and periodontal parameters T: Time: 12 months S :Randomized controlled trial research question:For patients receiving implants in esthetic zone, Does the use of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network hybrid abutment crown offer better patient satisfaction , less bone loss and better peri-implant clinical parameters when compared to lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hybrid Crowns on Single Implants in Esthetic Zone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
double blind :outcome asessor,participant

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

E-max hybrid crown

E-max hybrid crown Lithium Disilicate based ceramic which is characterized by high strength and optimum esthetics and considered a gold standard in anterior restorations

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

emax hybrid crown

Intervention Type OTHER

high srength glass ceramic that can be milled in sections up to 1mm .

Vita Enamic hybrid crown

Vita Enamic hybrid crown polymer infilltrated ceramic network(hybrid ceramic) characterized by low modulus of elasticity that acts as cushion on implants.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vita Enamic hybrid crown

Intervention Type OTHER

hybrid ceramic material in the form of mesoblocks where the ceramic block is attached to a ti base .The whole assembly is screw retained superstructure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vita Enamic hybrid crown

hybrid ceramic material in the form of mesoblocks where the ceramic block is attached to a ti base .The whole assembly is screw retained superstructure.

Intervention Type OTHER

emax hybrid crown

high srength glass ceramic that can be milled in sections up to 1mm .

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients above 18 years old.
2. Patients able to read and sign the informed consent document.
3. Medically free patients or with controlled systemic disease.
4. Patients with good bone quality and quantity evaluated using C.B.C.T.
5. Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
6. Patients having single missing recently extracted premolar tooth.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Young patients in growth stage.
2. Patients with unsuitable implantation sites (patients with major boney defects or sever bone resorption)
3. Pregnant women to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office.
4. Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease (hypertensive patient or uncontrolled diabetic patient)
5. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
6. Multiple adjacent missing teeth.
7. Patients with bad oral hygiene. -
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Inas Adel Mahmoud

assistant lecturer,fixed prosthodontic department, faculty of oral and dental medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inas adel mahmoud

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Inas Mahmoud, assistant lecturer

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +201008402645

Email: [email protected]

Reham El Basty, lecturer

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 01207169671

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

inas Mahmoud, assistant leturer

Role: primary

Reham El Basty, lecturer

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2017-11-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id