Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Hybrid Ceramic Versus E-Max Superstructures

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients receiving implants in the esthetic zone, would the use of new Nano hybrid ceramic crown material (Crystal Ultra) improve esthetic patient satisfaction and peri-implant tissue success when compared with Lithium Disilicate crown (E-max)?

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Shade Matching of Vita Suprinity Versus Lithium Disilicate (E-max) Ceramic Crowns in Esthetic Zone

NCT02846116

Personal Satisfaction

UNKNOWN NA

Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic Versus Hybrid Ceramic Superstructure Materials on Implant Stability

NCT02931903

Prosthesis Survival

COMPLETED NA

Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone

NCT03333889

Hybrid Crowns on Single Implants in Esthetic Zone

UNKNOWN NA

Pink and White Esthetic Scores of Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network and Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns

NCT03220321

Dental Implants

UNKNOWN NA

PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure

NCT03578913

PEEK Implant Supported Restoration

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patient will be treated in visits designated as follows:

Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, signing consents, clinical, radiographic examination and primary impression for diagnostic cast construction.

Visit 2: (first stage surgery): implant placement surgical procedure and postoperative radiograph.

Visit 3: After 3months (second stage surgery): re-opening of surgical site, placement of healing abutments and temporary crowns.

Visit 4: After 2 weeks, removing of temporary restorations and taking of final impressions Visit 5: placement of different ceramic crown superstructures and recording different outcome values.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prosthesis Survival

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Implant superstructure crown: All ceramic, IPS Emax

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

All ceramic

Intervention Type OTHER

IPS Emax: is an all ceramic crown that has proven superior aesthetics and strength properties.

Intervention

Implant superstructure crown: Hybrid ceramic, crystal Ultra crown

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Crystal Ultra

Intervention Type OTHER

Crystal Ultra: is a resin nano-ceramic material, that combines both advantages of ceramics and composites.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Crystal Ultra

Crystal Ultra: is a resin nano-ceramic material, that combines both advantages of ceramics and composites.

Intervention Type OTHER

All ceramic

IPS Emax: is an all ceramic crown that has proven superior aesthetics and strength properties.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

hybrid ceramics, resin nanoceramic e.g Cerasmart IPS-Emax, all ceramic crowns

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age above 18 years with at least one tooth missing in the esthetic area.
2. Available bone for implant placement:

A. Labial and Palatal Plate of bone not less than 2mm. B. Mesio- distal dimension not less than 6.5mm. C. Bone length not less than 9mm.
3. Patient with good oral hygiene.
4. Class 1 occlusion.
5. Lack of excessive parafunctional activity leading to implant failure.
6. Tooth extracted not less than 6 month.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Young patients in whom the jaws are still growing. (Less than 18 years).
2. Jaw pathology.
3. Smokers.
4. Uncontrolled Diabetic or particularly insulin-dependent.
5. Radiotherapy to the neck or face.
6. Multiple loss of teeth which may be indicated for more complicated procedure.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes