Accuracy and Scannability of Implant-Supported Framework Materials

NCT ID: NCT06423482

Last Updated: 2025-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-14

Study Completion Date

2024-11-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study aims to clinically evaluate and compare the scanning accuracy and the scannability of 2 different materials used in constructing frameworks for implant-supported prosthesis (titanium and PEEK).

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the digitization accuracy and scannability of milled titanium and PEEK implant-supported frameworks in intra-oral conditions and to evaluate the accuracy of the superstructures designed and constructed over the intraorally scanned framework.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: For implementing a fully digital workflow, intraoral scanning of prosthetic frameworks may be required for editing purposes in some clinical scenarios. Different materials can be used in constructing implant-supported prosthetic frameworks. However, the scannability and the influence of the material used on the accuracy of the intraoral scan are still unclear.

Aim of the study: The purpose of this in vivo study is to evaluate the scanning accuracy and the scannability of different framework materials and to assess the marginal adaptation and accuracy of the superstructures designed and constructed over different scanned framework materials.

Materials and methods: Two milled maxillary implant-supported frameworks constructed from 2 different materials will be used in this study. Group I will be constructed from titanium and group II from Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK). The frameworks will be digitized by using a desktop scanner (Tabletop Scanner, Medit T-310; Medit Corp). The STL file produced will be considered as a reference file. Each framework will be scanned intraorally (n=10) by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Medit i700; Medit Corp). The STL files obtained from the intraoral scanner will be compared to the reference STL file to assess the scannability. The unscanned surface area in a preset time limit will be used to determine the scannability of each framework. To evaluate the scanning accuracy, all STL files will be imported into a surface-matching software program (Medit Design v3.0.6 Build 286; Medit Corp) where deviation measurements in (μm) will be calculated. A total of 20 superstructures made of nano-ceramic hybrid resin (Flexcera™ Smile Ultra) will be 3D-printed from each STL file obtained from intraoral scanning of the frameworks and then the marginal adaptation will be evaluated by using a stereomicroscope (SZ1145TR; Olympus, Japan). The accuracy will also be assessed by using a surface-matching software program (Geomagic Control X v.2018.1.1; 3D Systems).

Analysis: Data will be collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed by using the appropriate statistical tests.

Keywords: Digitization, accuracy, trueness, precision, scannability, implant-supported frameworks, superstructures, marginal adaptation, titanium, PEEK, digital workflow, editing, nano-ceramic hybrid resin.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Digitalization Accuracy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PEEK bar

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PEEK bar

Intervention Type OTHER

The framework will be constructed from Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK). The framework will be digitized by using a desktop scanner (Tabletop Scanner, Medit T-310; Medit Corp). The STL file produced will be considered as a reference file. Each framework will be scanned intraorally (n=10) by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Medit i700; Medit Corp).

Titanium bar

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Titanium bar

Intervention Type OTHER

The framework will be constructed from titanium. The framework will be digitized by using a desktop scanner (Tabletop Scanner, Medit T-310; Medit Corp). The STL file produced will be considered as a reference file. Each framework will be scanned intraorally (n=10) by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Medit i700; Medit Corp).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PEEK bar

The framework will be constructed from Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK). The framework will be digitized by using a desktop scanner (Tabletop Scanner, Medit T-310; Medit Corp). The STL file produced will be considered as a reference file. Each framework will be scanned intraorally (n=10) by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Medit i700; Medit Corp).

Intervention Type OTHER

Titanium bar

The framework will be constructed from titanium. The framework will be digitized by using a desktop scanner (Tabletop Scanner, Medit T-310; Medit Corp). The STL file produced will be considered as a reference file. Each framework will be scanned intraorally (n=10) by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Medit i700; Medit Corp).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Maxillary edentulous adult patient with a good health status classified as ASA I or II physical status and having maxillary osseointegrated dental implants.
2. Adequate maxillary restorative space (6-8 mm).
3. Adequate zone of keratinized tissue (at least 2 mm).
4. Presence of an antagonistic dentate or rehabilitated arch.

Exclusion Criteria

1. A systemic disease that compromises osseointegration such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or metabolic bone diseases.
2. Improper implant position.
3. Heavy smoking.
4. Inability to obtain written informed consent.

\-
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nourhan Samy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nourhan Samy

Ph.D student

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alexandria University

Alexandria, Stanly, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0796-11/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Complete Digital Workflow
NCT07091786 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2/PHASE3