Comparing Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Secondary Telescopic Crowns on Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture.

NCT ID: NCT06637930

Last Updated: 2024-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-15

Study Completion Date

2024-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare

I- The clinical behavior of implant retained removable overdenture using telescopic retention system fabricated using CAD\\CAM techniques where the effects of the different material combinations were examined in regard to:

1. Retention of the mandibular over-denture.
2. Plaque accumulation, presence of calculus, bleeding tendency, health of peri-implant mucosa and probing depth.

II - The radiographic behavior regarding marginal bone level and bone density.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study compared implant-retained telescopic mandibular overdentures reinforced with milled metal framework (Co-Cr) and milled polymer (PEEK) in terms of retention, periimplant mucosal health, and radiographic changes in twelve patients.

Initially, all patients received conventional complete dentures. A CBCT was conducted prior to the implant surgical phase using a radiographic stent. Two implants were inserted interforaminally using a flapless method. The implants were then left for three months to allow for osseointegration, and the patients were instructed to wear their complete dentures during the healing process.

Following the osseointegration period, the prosthetic phase began, with all patients obtaining primary crowns constructed from titanium alloys. The patients were then randomly divided into two groups, 6 patients in each group. Group A received a COCR framework that included secondary crowns while group B received a PEEK framework and secondary crowns.

Retention was tested for each group (baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months) using a digital force gauge. The pulling force gradually increased until the denture was dislodged. The retentive force was measured during the initial separation of the telescopic crown.

Soft tissue conditions was assessed using single coded probe for each group (baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months).Bleeding tendency on probing, plaque accumulation, calculus deposition, perimplant mucosal health were the parameters for each group evaluation.

While the radiographic assessment was performed for each group (baseline, 6months, 9 months and12 months) using digital periapical radiographs by the means of XCP instrument and digital sensor. The marginal bone level was measured by evaluating the difference of bone level at the neck of the implant. The bone density was evaluated at three areas surrounding the implants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Edentulism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cobalt chromium(COCR) group

The secondary crowns and the framework were fabricated using milled Cobalt chromium alloy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible

Intervention Type OTHER

implant retained mandibular overdenture using telescopic attachment system. all the patients received 2 implants at the canine region bilaterally using sterelithographic guide , then healing period for 3 months for proper osseointegration , then digital intraoral scanning was performed to detect implant position using scannable bodies , abutments which act as primary crowns were designed on cad software then milled using premilled titanium abutments.the study grouping was performed then virtual model was done for the designing of the frameworks then milled according to the grouping of the study. Try in of the frameworks was done and overdentures were inserted.

* Retention force test was done using digital force gauge.
* Probing depth using Teflon coated periodontal probe.
* Marginal bone level and bone density were measured using digital periapical x-ray

Polyetheretherketone(PEEK) Group

The secondary crowns and the framework were fabricated using milled PEEK material

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible

Intervention Type OTHER

implant retained mandibular overdenture using telescopic attachment system. all the patients received 2 implants at the canine region bilaterally using sterelithographic guide , then healing period for 3 months for proper osseointegration , then digital intraoral scanning was performed to detect implant position using scannable bodies , abutments which act as primary crowns were designed on cad software then milled using premilled titanium abutments.the study grouping was performed then virtual model was done for the designing of the frameworks then milled according to the grouping of the study. Try in of the frameworks was done and overdentures were inserted.

* Retention force test was done using digital force gauge.
* Probing depth using Teflon coated periodontal probe.
* Marginal bone level and bone density were measured using digital periapical x-ray

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible

implant retained mandibular overdenture using telescopic attachment system. all the patients received 2 implants at the canine region bilaterally using sterelithographic guide , then healing period for 3 months for proper osseointegration , then digital intraoral scanning was performed to detect implant position using scannable bodies , abutments which act as primary crowns were designed on cad software then milled using premilled titanium abutments.the study grouping was performed then virtual model was done for the designing of the frameworks then milled according to the grouping of the study. Try in of the frameworks was done and overdentures were inserted.

* Retention force test was done using digital force gauge.
* Probing depth using Teflon coated periodontal probe.
* Marginal bone level and bone density were measured using digital periapical x-ray

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Completely edentulous patients
* Absence of any systematic contraindications to implant surgery,
* Presence of sufficient bone height and width to accommodate implants with length 14mmm and diameter 3.6mm.
* Inter-arch distance more than or equal 10 mm.
* Four months since the last extraction had taken place.
* No previous bone augmentation procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* psychological disorders prohibiting implant treatment.
* Heavy smoking (10 cigarettes/day)
* Alcohol and/or drug abuse,
* Physical disability that may interfere with the ability to perform oral hygiene.
* Patients were receiving drugs which impair healing .
Minimum Eligible Age

52 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amr El Sayed Khalifa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amr El Sayed Khalifa

assistant lecturer of prosthodontics

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emad TB Agamy, Professor of Prosthodontics

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Faculty of Dentistry, Minia university

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry

Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

528

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.