Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture

NCT ID: NCT07250503

Last Updated: 2025-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The global increase in the aging population has led to a rise in total edentulism, which remains a major public health concern. two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures have been regarded as the standard of care, offering superior retention, stability, comfort, and masticatory efficiency compared to conventional dentures. Among available attachment systems-bar, ball, stud, and magnet-the Equator attachment has gained popularity due to its low vertical profile, suitability for limited inter-occlusal space, and ease of handling.

Assessment of masticatory performance and occlusal balance can be objectively measured using devices such as bite force analyzers and the computerized T-Scan system, which quantifies occlusion and disocclusion times.

Conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) remains the most widely used denture base material; however, it has mechanical and biological limitations. Flexible denture base materials have been introduced to overcome these drawbacks by enhancing adaptation, distributing occlusal loads more evenly, and improving comfort and retention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

24 Patients will be randomly and equally divided into two treatment groups:

1. Group 1: Each patient in this group will receive conventional maxillary and mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin PMMA. In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by equator attachments.
2. Group 2: Patients in this group received the same type of treatment as the patients in group 1, but the mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin "breflex" The present study will be performed to compare the difference in retention, occlusal force distribution, occlusion and disocclusion time, and bite force for implant retained mandibular over denture using PMMA and flexible dentures base materials

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible Complete Edentulism Dental Implant Attachments Implant Retained Overdenture Edentulous Mouth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mandibular complete dentures processed into heat cured acrylic resin

Mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin (PMMA). In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional acrylic resin denture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin (PMMA). In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.

Mandibular thermoplastic nylon denture

Mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin breflex, In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flexible resin denture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin breflex, In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional acrylic resin denture

Mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin (PMMA). In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Flexible resin denture

Mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin breflex, In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All patients age must range from 60-70 years old.
2. All patients' ridges should be covered with firm mucosa free from any signs of inflammation or ulceration and exhibit adequate height and width of the residual alveolar ridge.
3. Patients should be free from any metabolic or bone disorder that contraindicate implant installation.
4. All patients must have sufficient inter arch space

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with oral or systemic diseases.
2. Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation.
3. Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism or clenching).
4. Heavy smoker or alcoholic patients.
5. Patients with history of temporo-mandibular dysfunction.
6. Patients with brain disorders or psychiatric disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Noha Taha Kamel Taha Alloush

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

28.4.24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.