Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency of Implant Supported Overdenture

NCT ID: NCT05877092

Last Updated: 2023-05-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the goal of this clinical trial To evaluate the effects of different base materials of mandibular implant supported overdenture with bar/clip attachment on masticatory efficacy.

Twenty-four edentulous patients were selected to place two inter-foraminal mandibular implants with custom-made cast bar to retain overdentures made from two different base material and divided into two groups.

The masticatory efficiency were tested using three different food categories (carrots, bananas, and apples) and measured by four parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Based on inclusion and exclusion standards for implant selection, a twenty-four completely edentulous medically fit male patient aged 50-70 years were selected from the removable prosthodontics clinical, Faculty of Dental Medicine. The patient selection was determined through oral and dental examination, which revealed class I arch relationship with adequate 20-25MM inter-arch space and free from any oral hard or soft tissue abnormality that can interfere with the treatment. The selection was excluded all patients who do not satisfy these normal criteria. Written consent was obtained from each patients, detailing all surgical and prosthetic steps as well as the treatment's advantages and disadvantages.

To obtain precise measurements of bone height and width at the implant site and accurately determine the size and type of the required implants, Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) was performed, guided with a radiographic stent for each selected patient.

According to the type of complete denture base material's construction, the twenty-four selected patients whose selected to participate in this trial, were grouped into two groups. Group I (n =12) patients with a heat polymerized acrylic resin complete mandibular overdenture HCG and In Group II (n =12) patients with a thermoplastic (polyamide) complete mandibular overdenture TPG, both groups were retained by a bar/clip attachment system.

The masticatory efficiencies were examined using three different food categories in terms of the level of hardness, such as (apples, bananas, and carrots). Patients installed their mandibular overdentures while sitting upright. Each participant was then given assurances to help them rest and not be disturbed before eating the test food, which was cut into equal parts (1cm × 1cm). The following measures were recorded using a stopwatch:

The Number of chewing cycle strokes up to the first sallow. The Number of chewing cycle strokes until the mouth is free of food. The number of swallows until the mouth is free of food. Time (in seconds) until the mouth is free of food. The data collected from the test groups, and a statistical evaluation conducted using the SPSS software program (IBM Company). The average, standard deviation, and lowest and highest values were also calculated for each group under consideration. A one-way ANOVA was also used to ascertain whether there were any significant differences in the averages of the different groups analyzed. Additionally, the Tukey test was used to evaluate whether averages differed significantly from each other at the specific probability level (P \< 0.05).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mastication Disorder Mandibular Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

acrylic resin denture base

complete overdenture constructed from heat cured acrylic resin for Group I

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

implants with overdentures

Intervention Type DEVICE

two implants with bar attachment placed in interforaminal of the mandible mandible of the participants, the patients were delivered conventional upper complete denture constructed from heat cured acrylic rein, but in implanted mandibular arch they were received complete overdenture constructed from heat cured acrylic resin for Group I, and complete thermoplastic denture was constructed for Group II.

thermoplastic denture

complete thermoplastic denture was constructed for Group II

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

implants with overdentures

Intervention Type DEVICE

two implants with bar attachment placed in interforaminal of the mandible mandible of the participants, the patients were delivered conventional upper complete denture constructed from heat cured acrylic rein, but in implanted mandibular arch they were received complete overdenture constructed from heat cured acrylic resin for Group I, and complete thermoplastic denture was constructed for Group II.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

implants with overdentures

two implants with bar attachment placed in interforaminal of the mandible mandible of the participants, the patients were delivered conventional upper complete denture constructed from heat cured acrylic rein, but in implanted mandibular arch they were received complete overdenture constructed from heat cured acrylic resin for Group I, and complete thermoplastic denture was constructed for Group II.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* completely edentulous
* class I arch relationship
* 20-25MM inter-arch space
* free from any oral hard or soft tissue abnormality

Exclusion Criteria

* partially dentate patients
* abnormal arch class (class II or III)
* patients wit flabby tissue, acquired defects, or bony exccestosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hamada Zaki Mahross Atia

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Al-Azhar univeristy

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

903/2935

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.