Comparison of Short Implant Assisted Mandibular Overdenture Designs
NCT ID: NCT04582162
Last Updated: 2023-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-05
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unsplinted implants
Unsplinted implants
Patients received ball abutments on each implant without splinting for retaining an implant retained mandibular overdenture.
Splinted implants
Splinted implants
Patients had their implants splinted using Rhein bars with ball extension for retaining an implant retained mandibular overdenture.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Unsplinted implants
Patients received ball abutments on each implant without splinting for retaining an implant retained mandibular overdenture.
Splinted implants
Patients had their implants splinted using Rhein bars with ball extension for retaining an implant retained mandibular overdenture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mandibular ridge should be a maximum of 10mm height and with a minimum width of 8 mm to insert implants without grafting procedures.
* Patients free from systemic diseases that contradict the use of dental implants.
* Patients with class I ridge relation.
* Patients with adequate zone of keratinized mucosa.
* Patients with U-shaped or square shaped arches
Exclusion Criteria
* Heavy smokers.
* Senile patients (over 75 years) with impaired neuromuscular control.
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Nourhan M.Aly
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nourhan M.Aly
Assistant Lecturer of Dental Public Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmed Weheda, M.Sc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Ahmed A Abdelhakim, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Magued H Fahmy, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Nermeen A Rady, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):203-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01271.x.
Bell RB, Blakey GH, White RP, Hillebrand DG, Molina A. Staged reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with autogenous bone graft and endosteal implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;60(10):1135-41. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.34986.
Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 x 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):930-7.
Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell'Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012 Jan;91(1):25-32. doi: 10.1177/0022034511425675. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):422-31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0.
Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Vazquez L, Belser UC. The anchorage of Branemark and ITI implants of different lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):593-600. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.120908.x.
Stellingsma C, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Use of short endosseous implants and an overdenture in the extremely resorbed mandible: a five-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Apr;58(4):382-7; discussion 387-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90917-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
short implant in overdentures
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id