Evaluation of Masticatory Performance and Patient Satisfaction for Conventional and 3D Printed Implant Overdentures
NCT ID: NCT06148727
Last Updated: 2023-11-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-14
2023-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
it was concluded that 3D printed implant overdenture showed promising results regarding chewing efficiency and patient satisfaction compared to conventionally fabricated implant overdenture.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Materials and Methods: Twelve completely edentulous healthy participants received new conventional dentures. Four interforaminal implants were inserted in the mandible. After osseointegration, bar was constructed with trapezoidal configuration. Each patient received randomly the following overdentures using a crossover design: conventional heat cured acrylic resin overdenture, 3d printed overdenture ( developed by scanning of mandibular conventional overdenture). Masticatory performance was evaluated with the two-colour mixing ability test after 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 masticatory cycles. Patient satisfaction was also measured using McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire. Evaluation was done after 3 months of using each overdenture.
Conclusion: Within this clinical study limitations, 3D printed implant overdenture showed promising results regarding chewing efficiency and patient satisfaction compared to conventionally fabricated implant overdenture.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional heat cured overdenture group
patients received 4 interforamenal implants connected by 3 bar assembly and conventional heat cured overdenture (Control Group)
Dental implant placement
Procedure/ surgery: Surgical placement of dental implants, four interforaminal dental implants were placed
Bar attachment
Device: attachment, implants were connected to each others by 3 implant assembly in a trapezoidal design implants were loaded after 3 months of osseo-integration Control Group: patients received coventionally constructed heat cured overdenture Study Group: patients received 3d printed overdenture
3d- printed overdenture group
patients received 4 interforamenal implants connected by 3 bar assembly and 3d printed overdenture (Study Group)
Dental implant placement
Procedure/ surgery: Surgical placement of dental implants, four interforaminal dental implants were placed
Bar attachment
Device: attachment, implants were connected to each others by 3 implant assembly in a trapezoidal design implants were loaded after 3 months of osseo-integration Control Group: patients received coventionally constructed heat cured overdenture Study Group: patients received 3d printed overdenture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implant placement
Procedure/ surgery: Surgical placement of dental implants, four interforaminal dental implants were placed
Bar attachment
Device: attachment, implants were connected to each others by 3 implant assembly in a trapezoidal design implants were loaded after 3 months of osseo-integration Control Group: patients received coventionally constructed heat cured overdenture Study Group: patients received 3d printed overdenture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* adequate restorative space \[12-15 mm from the mucosa of the mandibular ridge to the occlusal plane- Class I according to Ahuja and Cagna 23 for bar supported implant overdenture. This was verified by direct measurement of old denture
* Angel's class I maxillo-mandibular relationship.
Exclusion Criteria
* irradiation of the head and neck region
* chemotherapy within the past 3 years
* bone metabolic diseases as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* smoking habit
50 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed shady
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Shady, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry, Prosthodontics department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mansoura University, Faculty of dentistry
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nabil MS, Mahanna FF, Said MM. Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04389-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A20011122
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id