Single vs. Two Implants for Mandibular Overdentures

NCT ID: NCT06599450

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to compare the use of single implants in the symphyseal and parasymphyseal, and two implants were inserted in the canine area bilaterally to assist mandibular complete overdentures regarding clinical evaluation, marginal bone loss, and masticatory efficiency. The null hypothesis was that there was no statistically significant difference in clinical evaluation, marginal bone loss, and masticatory efficiency among single symphyseal implants, single parasymphyseal implants, and two-implant-assisted complete mandibular overdentures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized, controlled clinical trial compared the symphyseal and parasymphyseal single implants versus two implants in complete mandibular overdentures. Fifteen completely edentulous male patients (50-65 years) were chosen and randomly grouped into three equal groups (five patients in each) according to the position and number of the received implants to assist mandibular complete overdentures. Group I: single median implant. Group II: single parasymphyseal implant. Group III: two implants were inserted in the canine area bilaterally. After three months of osseointegration, the lower denture was transformed into an implant-assisted complete mandibular overdenture. Clinical observations were documented on the day of loading, three, six, and nine months later for each implant. Follow-up CBCT scans were performed to assess marginal bone loss on the day of loading, six and twelve months later. The masticatory efficiency evaluation was conducted one month and three months after loading.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bleeding on Probing Alveolar Bone Loss Mastication Dental Plaque Periodontal Index

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

One median implant

One median implant to retain mandibular complete overdenture

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Root form dental implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of titanium endosteal root form threaded tapered two-piece dental implant to assist mandibular complete overdenture

One parasymphyseal implant

One parasymphyseal implant to retain mandibular complete overdenture

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Root form dental implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of titanium endosteal root form threaded tapered two-piece dental implant to assist mandibular complete overdenture

Two implants

Two implants in the intraforaminal distance to retain mandibular complete overdenture

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Root form dental implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of titanium endosteal root form threaded tapered two-piece dental implant to assist mandibular complete overdenture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Root form dental implant

Placement of titanium endosteal root form threaded tapered two-piece dental implant to assist mandibular complete overdenture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with a class I Maxillo-mandibular jaw relationship
* patients with residual ridges had normal morphology, were free from severe bony undercuts or flabby tissue, and were covered by firm mucoperiosteum.
* A cone beam CT of the lower arch was made to detect the presence of pathological lesions, remaining roots, or impacted teeth in the arch and evaluate both bone quality and quantity, especially in the area of interest

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with current chemotherapy or radiotherapy, bleeding disorders, uncontrolled diabetes
* patients with a history of drug therapy that interferes with bone resorption or deposition (e.g., the prolonged use of glucocorticoids, antiresorptive medications, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and proton-pump inhibitors),
* Those with any physical reasons that could affect follow-up, psychiatric problems, heavy smokers, drug or alcohol addicts, immunocompromised patients, abnormal jaw relationship, inadequate inter arch space.
* patients with temporomandibular disorders and para-functional habits (e.g., bruxing and clenching).
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Ezzat Ahmed Al-Gazzar

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmed B El-okl, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Removable Prosthodontics, Al-Azhar University, Asuit, EGY

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AUAREC20210006-5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.