Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks

NCT ID: NCT06412159

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose:Within subject study aim to compare the overall accuracy and fit of different components for mandibular metallic removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting using combined analog-digital, and fully digital impression techniques.

Material and methods. Two RPD frameworks were fabricated for each of the 24 participants using each of the 2 techniques of the 24 participants enrolled, were of mandibular Kennedy class I, the first technique was the combined analog-digital workflow had the analog steps include: a physical impression was made using polyvinyl siloxane, stone casts were made, then the stone cast was scanned with a laboratory scanner to generate a digital cast. The 3Shape CAD software was then used to design a digital RPD, which was fabricated from a cobalt-chroumum alloy by selective laser melting. The second technique was fully digital where an intraoral digital scanner was used to make a definitive scan, which was sent to the 3Shape software for digitally designing the RPD framework and subsequent selective laser melting for fabrication. For both frameworks in the same participant, the same design was used for consistency. To assess the accuracy of fit, based on STL data analysis (intra-oral digital superimposition evaluation), a color map was constructed using non metrology software, and overall fit accuracy and the misfit (distance between each framework component and the reference intra-oral scan) were measured at rest, guiding plane and lingual plate areas.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Twenty four mandibular bilateral partially edentulous participants aged from 50 to 65 years having mandibular Class I Kennedy classification were selected randomly from the outpatient clinic of the prosthodontic department. The clinical study was explained to the patients and they accept it and an informed consent were signed by all them

For each patient, two different cobalt chromium removable partial denture frameworks were constructed; the first one was fabricated using combined analog-digital workflow (group 1) and the other framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow (group 2) and comparing them through evaluation of:

1. Over all accuracy
2. Accuracy of fit of occlusal rests, major connector, Guiding plane/plate relation and retentive terminal of I bar clasp.

Two techniques were used to fabricate 48 RPD frameworks in total. Fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial denture framework using combined analog-digital workflow (group 1)

The Removable partial denture frameworks for group 1 were fabricated as follow:

The first technique was a combined analog-digital technique, in which a physical definitive impression was made and a stone cast was fabricated. a physical impression was made using polyvinyl siloxane impression material. , and a stone cast was poured using Type IV stone . In an edentulous area, border molding was first accomplished using a green modeling plastic impression compound . The impression and stone cast were evaluated critically to ensure quality. The stone cast was then scanned using a laboratory scanner to produce a virtual 3D master model. The 3Shape CAD software was used to design a digital RPD . The RPD framework was designed with an lingual plate mandibular major connector, I bar retentive clasps on the first premolars.

The definitive STL design file was then sent to the Dental Laboratory, to be selective laser melted in Co-Cr alloy.

The Overall fit accuracy and the misfit at some areas where the accuracy measurement was performed, included: The rest/rest seat areas of right and left premolars , the right and left guide plane/plate area , the mandibular major connector area including the superior border of lingual plate area and retentive terminal of I bar clasp.

All measurements were made by a single investigator and were repeated five times. The average error of measurement was approximately 0.002 mm. As a basis for our evaluation of misfit, a distance of 0 to 0.05 mm was considered close contact (no gap), and a distance of 0.05 to 0.31 mm was defined as clinically acceptable fit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Denture Partial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

selective laser melting removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by conventional technique

selective laser melting removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by conventional technique

Group Type OTHER

Selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow

Intervention Type OTHER

completely digital work flow Conventional technique versus complete digital technique

selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow

selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow

Group Type OTHER

Selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow

Intervention Type OTHER

completely digital work flow Conventional technique versus complete digital technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow

completely digital work flow Conventional technique versus complete digital technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mandibular Class I Kennedy classification were selected randomly from the outpatient clinic of the prosthodontic department

Exclusion Criteria

* other classes of removable partial denture maxillary partially edentulous patients
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kafrelsheikh University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nourhan Ahmed Ragheb

associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nourhan Ragheb

Kafr Elsheikh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elgamal M, Ibrahim AM, Fadl BT, Ragheb NA. Accuracy assessment of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting using two different workflows: A cross-over clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06214-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40437453 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KFSIRB200-130

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.