Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT ID: NCT06412159
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-01
2024-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Material and methods. Two RPD frameworks were fabricated for each of the 24 participants using each of the 2 techniques of the 24 participants enrolled, were of mandibular Kennedy class I, the first technique was the combined analog-digital workflow had the analog steps include: a physical impression was made using polyvinyl siloxane, stone casts were made, then the stone cast was scanned with a laboratory scanner to generate a digital cast. The 3Shape CAD software was then used to design a digital RPD, which was fabricated from a cobalt-chroumum alloy by selective laser melting. The second technique was fully digital where an intraoral digital scanner was used to make a definitive scan, which was sent to the 3Shape software for digitally designing the RPD framework and subsequent selective laser melting for fabrication. For both frameworks in the same participant, the same design was used for consistency. To assess the accuracy of fit, based on STL data analysis (intra-oral digital superimposition evaluation), a color map was constructed using non metrology software, and overall fit accuracy and the misfit (distance between each framework component and the reference intra-oral scan) were measured at rest, guiding plane and lingual plate areas.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760
Comparing Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Maxillary Implants: Extraoral vs. Intraoral Techniques
NCT06669065
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For each patient, two different cobalt chromium removable partial denture frameworks were constructed; the first one was fabricated using combined analog-digital workflow (group 1) and the other framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow (group 2) and comparing them through evaluation of:
1. Over all accuracy
2. Accuracy of fit of occlusal rests, major connector, Guiding plane/plate relation and retentive terminal of I bar clasp.
Two techniques were used to fabricate 48 RPD frameworks in total. Fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial denture framework using combined analog-digital workflow (group 1)
The Removable partial denture frameworks for group 1 were fabricated as follow:
The first technique was a combined analog-digital technique, in which a physical definitive impression was made and a stone cast was fabricated. a physical impression was made using polyvinyl siloxane impression material. , and a stone cast was poured using Type IV stone . In an edentulous area, border molding was first accomplished using a green modeling plastic impression compound . The impression and stone cast were evaluated critically to ensure quality. The stone cast was then scanned using a laboratory scanner to produce a virtual 3D master model. The 3Shape CAD software was used to design a digital RPD . The RPD framework was designed with an lingual plate mandibular major connector, I bar retentive clasps on the first premolars.
The definitive STL design file was then sent to the Dental Laboratory, to be selective laser melted in Co-Cr alloy.
The Overall fit accuracy and the misfit at some areas where the accuracy measurement was performed, included: The rest/rest seat areas of right and left premolars , the right and left guide plane/plate area , the mandibular major connector area including the superior border of lingual plate area and retentive terminal of I bar clasp.
All measurements were made by a single investigator and were repeated five times. The average error of measurement was approximately 0.002 mm. As a basis for our evaluation of misfit, a distance of 0 to 0.05 mm was considered close contact (no gap), and a distance of 0.05 to 0.31 mm was defined as clinically acceptable fit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
selective laser melting removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by conventional technique
selective laser melting removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by conventional technique
Selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow
completely digital work flow Conventional technique versus complete digital technique
selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow
selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow
Selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow
completely digital work flow Conventional technique versus complete digital technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Selective laser melting framework was fabricated using completely digital workflow
completely digital work flow Conventional technique versus complete digital technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kafrelsheikh University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nourhan Ahmed Ragheb
associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nourhan Ragheb
Kafr Elsheikh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elgamal M, Ibrahim AM, Fadl BT, Ragheb NA. Accuracy assessment of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting using two different workflows: A cross-over clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06214-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KFSIRB200-130
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.