Comparison of Current Subgingival Debridement Methods

NCT ID: NCT06835452

Last Updated: 2025-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-24

Study Completion Date

2025-02-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of current subgingival debridement methods used in the treatment of Stage 1 and Stage 2 periodontitis patients, the aesthetic condition achieved after these treatments, and the pain felt during treatment.

90 female patients who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (Stage 1-2) and required supra-subgingival scaling for treatment purposes, and who volunteered to participate in the study, were included in the study. Three treatment groups were determined. 30 people were included in each group. Periodontal examination was performed before and after the treatments in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month and the data on the collected periodontal parameters were analyzed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Periodontal parametreler Gingival index, plaque index, periodontal pocket depth and bleeding index on probing.

It was evaluated with the visual analog scale for pain and aesthetics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Treatment of Periodontitis Guided Biofilm Therapy Subgingival Plaque Subgingival Debridement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1- classic treatment

Subgingival debridement was performed using the Cavitron and Gracey curette (this is the method that is used routinely).

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 2-Guided Biofilm Therapy

Subgingival debridement was performed with the Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT+Airabrasion) method. This method is the most up-to-date method. The biofilm is shown to the patient with plate dye, and the biofilm is cleaned with air abrasion and perio flow (EMS device cavitron). In the patient's control sessions, the patient's oral hygiene motivation is tried to be increased by dyeing the biofilm.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 3- Classical treatment and with Plaque paint

the dental calculus and biofilm were stained with plaque paint, shown to the patient with the help of a mirror, and then routine subgingival debridement was performed.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Systemically healthy patient (without known chronic disease)
* Periodontal diagnostic data (Gingival Index, Plaque Index, Periodontal pocket depths, Attachment loss, Radiological data-Bone loss data) are complete
* Treatments diagnosed with stage 1-2 periodontitis and those who have not had periodontal treatment in the last 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Having a systemic disease
* Pregnant and lactating women
* smoker
* Those who do not want to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Selcen Ozcan Bulut

Assistant prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

Niğde, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023/65

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.