The Effect of Two Different Learning Methods on Disaster Perception and Management in Nursing Students

NCT ID: NCT06817317

Last Updated: 2025-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-10

Study Completion Date

2024-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was planned to evaluate the effect of two different learning methods on the perception of disaster preparedness and competences related to disaster management in nursing students.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Disasters are an important public health problem due to their unpredictable duration, disruptions in society and health services, loss of life and property, significant economic losses, deterioration in psycho-social welfare and their effects in subsequent periods. Disaster events are events that exceed the local response capacity, where existing resources are insufficient in demand and require external assistance at international level. Therefore, disasters should be addressed not only in terms of their devastating effects but also in terms of the appropriate preparedness of the available resources in the community. Especially in the event of a disaster, it is certain that the demand for life-threatening medical care will increase, and the presence of timely accessible, equipped and prepared health workers is very important in disaster response.

Considering the increasing frequency of disasters and large-scale public health emergencies, this situation makes the disaster-related aspects of nursing particularly important. Nurses can serve as first responders, direct health care providers, point of care coordinators, information sources, educators and counsellors in disaster areas. However, most nurses and nursing students are not properly prepared for disaster situations.

Many disaster nursing education programmes are offered as themes within existing courses (health protection and promotion, public health and emergency nursing courses) through elective courses, seminars and conferences. As in many other areas of undergraduate nursing education, disaster education often adopts traditional instructor-centred teaching methods. According to the students' point of view, this teaching strategy has a monotonous and boring structure and may negatively affect the students' willingness to learn by shortening their attention span.

Simulation and scenario-based disaster nursing education programmes using standardised patients can be useful in disaster nursing education by improving students' skills and preparation. In case of disaster, models allow nurses to provide better service and performance.

In addition, peer-assisted and self-directed learning method content and teaching strategies aim to improve students' autonomy by incorporating students' feedback and comments into the design of the course. Student-centred education can consist of a variety of teaching tools and techniques, online audio-visual materials, activities, games and storytelling that reflect students' preferences. The student-centred education approach plays an important role in supporting the public health infrastructure and is receiving increasing attention in studies related to disaster preparedness and response.

In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the effect of two different learning methods on the perception of disaster preparedness and competencies related to disaster management in nursing students.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Students, Nursing Learning Techniques

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Intervention group: Model Based Training Group; Intervention group: Peer and Self-Learning Group; Control group: routine education programme
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group 1

In this study, 'Disaster Nursing' course is an elective course integrated into the nursing curriculum. Disaster nursing course content to be applied to the Model based training group; the topics related to pre-disaster, disaster, post-disaster and recovery phases were prepared in line with International Nurses Association (ICN) Basic Competence Areas in Disaster Nursing, General Directorate of Emergency Health Services First Aid Training Guide and Jenning's Disaster Management Model in Nursing.

One day a week for 5 weeks, the theoretical part 100 minutes (transferred by the academic staff responsible for the course), laboratory 50 minutes (transferred by theNational Medical Rescue Team personnel).

There are 20 students in this group. Data were collected through data collection tools at pre-intervention, 5-week post-intervention, 1st month follow-up, 3rd month follow-up and 6th month follow-up stages.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Model Based Training

Intervention Type OTHER

experimental group

Intervention Group 2

In this study, peer and self-learning group consisted of four different seminar groups of five students randomised. The students were informed about creating a seminar programme on disaster nursing and management and making presentations until the dates determined at the beginning of the semester. It was explained that they would use peer and self-learning methods in seminar preparation and that the researchers would not intervene in the techniques they would create.

Four different seminar groups were formed. There are 5 students in each group. Each group prepares a seminar on disaster nursing and management by using peer and self-learning methods.

There are 20 students in this group. For 4 weeks, the groups made seminar presentations for 150 minutes one day a week.

All seminar groups came together in the last week and formed a group discussion on disaster nursing research and development activities.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peer and Self-Learning Group

Intervention Type OTHER

experimental group

Control Group

It consists of students who are not included in the intervention groups. The control group continues the education process in the routine education programme.

This group consists of 24 students.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Model Based Training

experimental group

Intervention Type OTHER

Peer and Self-Learning Group

experimental group

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older Active student registration in the system between the specified dates Accepted to participate in the study verbally and in writing after being informed Who have not received training on disaster management before General health status (systemic, consciousness, sensation) is suitable for the research process

Exclusion Criteria

* Having theoretical/practical training on disaster management Non-volunteering
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Enise Sürücü

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Zonguldak, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physiotherapy and Disaster
NCT07296367 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION