Effect of Preoperative Sleep Disturbance on Postoperative Pain and Recovery
NCT ID: NCT06815744
Last Updated: 2025-02-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-11-01
2024-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Association Between Preoperative Insomnia and Postoperative Quality of Recovery : A Prospective Observational Study
NCT06008873
The Effect of Mindfulness Training Before Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty on Sleep Quality
NCT05295004
Sleep and Performance in Surgeons
NCT06213246
Sex Difference Effects on Postoperative Sleep, Inflammation and Cognition in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
NCT05059548
Sleep, Pain and Inflammatory Processes in Older Adults With Osteoarthritis
NCT01683799
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data collection Perioperative visits and basic information collection were performed by a uniformly trained anesthesiologist before surgery in all study subjects. The demographic characteristics of the participants, such as age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and sleep quality scores were recorded.
The following parameters were documented after surgery: postoperative pain score, consumption of hydromorphone (HM) 24 hours after surgery, and the number of rescue analgesia and quality of recovery 24 hours after surgery.
Before anesthesia, 3 ml of venous blood was collected from the non-infusion side of the patient (on an empty stomach). The whole blood was collected into a blood collection tube containing EDTA sodium salt. After standing at room temperature for 30 minutes, the blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was then placed in a cryopreservation box and stored at -80℃ until use.
Laboratory Testing Serum BDNF and CB1R concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Associated definitions Sleep disorders refer to various functional disturbances occurring within the sleep-wake cycle, including difficulties falling asleep, abnormally short or long sleep durations (hypersomnia), sleep-related breathing disorders, and parasomnias\[27\]. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is utilized to assess patients' sleep quality. The PSQI primarily evaluates a patient's sleep quality over the past month\[28, 29\]. This scale consists of 19 self-rated items and 5 other-rated items. Excluding the 19th self-rated item and the 5 other-rated items, the remaining 18 self-rated items are categorized into seven dimensions: sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of hypnotic medication, and daytime dysfunction. A 4-point Likert scale is applied, with each dimension scoring from 0 to 3. The cumulative score across all dimensions constitutes the total PSQI score, ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. The PSQI demonstrates a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5% in identifying patients with sleep disorders. A total score exceeding 5 suggests the presence of a sleep disorder\[28\]. Based on PSQI scores, patients are categorized into two groups: the normal sleep group (PSQI ≤ 5) and the poor sleep group (PSQI \> 5).
The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate the level of postoperative pain in patients. NRS scores were recorded at 2h, 6h, 12h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively, and the incidence of moderate to severe pain at corresponding time points was calculated. On this scale, 0 represents no pain, while 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Based on the NRS scores, patients were classified into three pain categories: no pain (0), mild pain (1-3/10), and moderate to severe pain (≥4/10)\[30\].
Quality of recovery (QoR) is a crucial concept in perioperative patient management. Assessing QoR is significant for patient prognosis and economics, offering potential for clinical and research applications and enhancing perioperative patient satisfaction. The QoR-15 scale is employed to evaluate patients' recovery quality at 24 hours postoperatively. The QoR-15 score is a recommended outcome measure in studies focusing on postoperative patient comfort\[26\]. This scale comprises 15 questions assessing five dimensions of patients' postoperative health status\[31\], including physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, emotions, and pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, with a total possible score of 150, where higher scores indicate better recovery.
Anesthesia Protocol All enrolled patients underwent a unified anesthesia protocol. After entering the operating room, patients received routine intravenous infusion oxygen inhalation and were connected to a multifunction electrocardiogram monitor. In the lateral position, a subarachnoid block was performed at the L3-4 intervertebral space using a spinal anesthesia needle. Upon successful puncture and withdrawal of clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 2ml of 0.75% bupivacaine mixed with CSF to a total volume of 3ml was slowly injected, with 2ml administered. After completion, the spinal anesthesia needle was removed, and the level of anesthesia was controlled below T8. If the subarachnoid block failed, the anesthesia method was changed to general anesthesia, and the case was excluded from the study. Before the incision, blood was driven away from the surgical site using an Esmarch bandage, and an electric tourniquet was applied with a pressure of 300 mmHg. At the end of the surgery, the tourniquet was released slowly while the patient's vital signs and discomfort were observed. Patients were then transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) for observation for 30 minutes.
Postoperative analgesia protocol: All patients followed a standardized protocol for postoperative pain management. Oral etoricoxib 120 mg (Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., specification: 60 mg/tablet, 2 times/day) was given for preemptive analgesia on the day before surgery. This analgesic regimen was repeated when patients resumed oral intake postoperatively. A "cocktail" therapy (compounding betamethasone injection 1 mL, epinephrine 0.5 mL, ropivacaine hydrochloride 150 mg, diluted with normal saline to 100 mL) was administered before suturing. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) postoperatively, consisting of hydromorphone (HM) 6 mg diluted with 0.9% NaCl solution to 100 mL, with an infusion rate of 2.0 mL/h, a PCIA bolus of 0.5 mL, and a lockout time of 15 minutes. The criterion for initiating PCIA therapy was an NRS score of ≥3. When the NRS score was ≥4\[32\], patients were instructed to press the PCIA pump for medication. If the effective PCIA bolus presses were ≥2 times within 30 minutes or the NRS score remained ≥4, rescue analgesia with 40 mg of intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug parecoxib sodium was administered.
Statistical Analyses A descriptive analysis of patients' basic characteristics was conducted based on PSQI scores. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies or percentages, and comparisons between groups were made using the Chi-square test. For continuous variables, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normal distribution, and Levene's test was applied to check for homogeneity of variance. Normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (± s) and compared using the t-test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's correlation analysis was employed to examine the association between various indicators and preoperative PSQI scores.
A multivariate logistic regression model was employed to examine the association between the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) concentrations, and the incidence of moderate to severe pain within 24 hours following surgery, with the latter serving as the dependent variable. Model 1 did not adjust for confounding factors; Model 2 adjusted for age and gender; Model 3 added body mass index (BMI), operation time (\<80 min, ≥80 min), education level (below high school, high school, and above), diabetes (yes, no), hypertension (yes, no), and dyslipidemia (yes, no) to Model 2.
The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were selected as knots. A generalized linear regression model combined with a restricted cubic spline model was employed to analyze the relationship and dose-response relationship between PSQI, BDNF, CB1R, and postoperative 24-hour QoR-15 scores and HM consumption after adjusting for confounding factors. Additionally, the same variables involved in logistic regression were corrected. A Poverall \<0.05 indicated the presence of a dose-response relationship between variables, while a Pnonlinear \<0.05 suggested a nonlinear dose-response relationship between two variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
the normal sleep group
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI) ≤ 5
No interventions assigned to this group
the poor sleep group (PSQI > 5)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI) \> 5
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gansu Provincial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jie Zhang
Resident physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jianjun Xue
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Gansu provincial hospital of TCM
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gansu provincial hospital of TCM
Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-044-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.