Infiltration Anesthesia vs. Block Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT06766981

Last Updated: 2025-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-10

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Checking the effectiveness of the infiltration technique of local anesthetic agent as an alternative to inferior dental nerve block during tooth extraction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who need their Mandibular first Molar to be removed under local anaesthesia. The first group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration. In comparison, the second group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Pain will be measured para-operatively using a verbal rating scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Extraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The interventional group will undergo tooth extraction under the infiltration anaesthesia technique
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Block

This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.

Infiltration

This group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration for tooth extraction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Infiltration with Articain 4%

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The experimental group of patients that are diagnosed for tooth extraction of mandibular 1st. molar will undergo extraction using an infiltration technique for local anaesthesia. In contrast to the conventional group that will receive Inferior alveolar nerve block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Infiltration with Articain 4%

The experimental group of patients that are diagnosed for tooth extraction of mandibular 1st. molar will undergo extraction using an infiltration technique for local anaesthesia. In contrast to the conventional group that will receive Inferior alveolar nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Regional Anaesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The systemic condition must be normal.
* Patient has no cardiovascular, metabolic, or transmitted disease.
* The patient has a Mandibular 1st. Molar tooth indicated for extraction.
* The tooth is non-restorable.

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic cardiovascular condition, metabolic, or infectious disease.
* Pregnant women.
* The tooth is restorable.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

58 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Babylon University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sinan A. Shwailiya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sinan A. Shwailiya

Lect.Dr

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

College of Dentistry, University of Babylon

Hillah, Babylon, Iraq

Site Status

College of Dentistry/University of Babylon

Hillah, Babylon, Iraq

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iraq

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bataineh AB, Nusair YM, Al-Rahahleh RQ. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3239-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2738-x. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30417227 (View on PubMed)

Madden VJ, Kamerman P, Leake HB, Catley MJ, Heathcote LC, Moseley GL. The Sensation and Pain Rating Scale: easy to use, clear to interpret, and responsive to clinical change. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 9:2023.09.08.23295128. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.08.23295128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37732279 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

35/2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.