Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-10
2025-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hyaluronidase Enzymes and Local Anesthesia
NCT06980363
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Lower Posterior Tooth Extraction.
NCT07048834
Evaluation of the Success Rate of Pulpal Anesthesia in Mandibular First Molar Following Infiltration of 4% Articaine Alone and as Supplemental Injection After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
NCT01593930
Comparison of Intraligamentary Anesthesia With the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for the Extraction of Mandibular Molars.
NCT06611865
The Anesthetic Efficacy of Lidocaine and Articaine as Buccal Injection for Maxillary Premolar Teeth Extraction.
NCT05951907
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Block
This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.
Infiltration
This group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration for tooth extraction
Infiltration with Articain 4%
The experimental group of patients that are diagnosed for tooth extraction of mandibular 1st. molar will undergo extraction using an infiltration technique for local anaesthesia. In contrast to the conventional group that will receive Inferior alveolar nerve block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Infiltration with Articain 4%
The experimental group of patients that are diagnosed for tooth extraction of mandibular 1st. molar will undergo extraction using an infiltration technique for local anaesthesia. In contrast to the conventional group that will receive Inferior alveolar nerve block
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has no cardiovascular, metabolic, or transmitted disease.
* The patient has a Mandibular 1st. Molar tooth indicated for extraction.
* The tooth is non-restorable.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women.
* The tooth is restorable.
18 Years
58 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Babylon University
OTHER
Sinan A. Shwailiya
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sinan A. Shwailiya
Lect.Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
College of Dentistry, University of Babylon
Hillah, Babylon, Iraq
College of Dentistry/University of Babylon
Hillah, Babylon, Iraq
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bataineh AB, Nusair YM, Al-Rahahleh RQ. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3239-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2738-x. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
Madden VJ, Kamerman P, Leake HB, Catley MJ, Heathcote LC, Moseley GL. The Sensation and Pain Rating Scale: easy to use, clear to interpret, and responsive to clinical change. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 9:2023.09.08.23295128. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.08.23295128.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
35/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.