Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction.
NCT ID: NCT06630819
Last Updated: 2025-05-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-24
2026-05-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of Buccal Infiltration Only Using Articaine for Extraction of Mandibular Molar
NCT06161714
Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration
NCT05223075
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Lower Posterior Tooth Extraction.
NCT07048834
Comparing Buccal Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Extraction of Mandibular Teeth
NCT04294745
Articaine Infiltration in Anesthetizing Mandibular Second Primary Molars
NCT06201949
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Local infiltration technique has been proven as a safer and less painful anesthetic injection technique compared to IANB. Unfortunately, the dense nature of cortical bone in the mandibular posterior region hinders sufficient diffusion of anesthetic solution during infiltration. Thus, to achieve an adequate anesthesia for a painless dental extraction of mandibular posterior teeth by infiltration technique, a strong and effective local anesthetic agent having a deeper penetrating property should be used.
Articaine is one of the most widely used local anesthetic agents. It is more potent and has shown more success rate than Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in providing anesthesia in mandibular and maxillary posterior teeth by buccal infiltration diffusibility.
This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Buccal infiltration of 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine
3.6 ml of 4% Articaine
Buccal infiltration of 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine.
Group B
Buccal infiltration of 1.8 ml of 4% Articaine
1.8 ml of 4% Articaine
Buccal infiltration of 1.8 ml of 4% Articaine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1.8 ml of 4% Articaine
Buccal infiltration of 1.8 ml of 4% Articaine
3.6 ml of 4% Articaine
Buccal infiltration of 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients aged ≥ 18 years of age.
* Patients requiring extraction of mandibular posterior teeth including grossly decayed tooth, grade I mobile tooth, root stumps and indicated for therapeutic reasons.
* Patients not allergic to the drugs or anesthetic agents used in the surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients indicated for surgical extraction of teeth.
* Patients already taking medications affecting pain assessment.
* Pregnant patients.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Qassim University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Qassim University
Buraidah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia
College of Dentistry, Qassim University
Buraidah, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
608/45/14624
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.