Comparison Between Efficiency of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques Using Articaine 4% 1:100000

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-15

Study Completion Date

2017-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This split mouth randomized control trial is designed as to compare the effectiveness of the buccal infiltration technique with the gold standard inferior alveolar nerve block in anesthetizing mandibular second primary molars to undergoing pulpal treatment.

patient will be videotaped during pulpal treatment of their teeth and an accessing pain will be through an objective pain scale (SEM scale), (sound-eye-motor scale).

the patient will be asked to fill in a subjective Wong Baker pain scale for the pain suffered during injecting the local anesthetic agent in both techniques.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Efficiency of Single Buccal Infiltration Versus Buccal and Intrapapillary Infiltration

NCT04458142

Anesthesia, Local

UNKNOWN NA

Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anesthesia

NCT05221190

Anesthesia

COMPLETED NA

Evaluation of the Effect of Intra-ligamentary Injection of Diclofenac Potassium Versus Articaine on Anaesthetic Efficacy in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.

NCT06500871

Teeth With Acute Irreverseble Pulpitis

NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1

Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration

NCT05223075

Pain

UNKNOWN PHASE2

Different Volumes of Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Irreversible Pulpitis

NCT05840913

Drug Effect Pulpitis - Irreversible

COMPLETED PHASE2

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine

inferior alveolar nerve block using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine

Intervention Type DRUG

an anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

buccal infiltration with 4% articaine

buccal infiltration using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

buccal infiltration with 4% articaine

Intervention Type DRUG

anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine

an anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

buccal infiltration with 4% articaine

anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. first dental visit.
2. cooperative children (rating 4 or 3 based on Frankl behavior scale) aging from 6 to 8 years suffering from one or more deep carious lesions in their primary molars seeking treatment.
3. Restorable molars with stainless steel crowns.

Exclusion Criteria

1. medically compromised patients. uncooperative children (rating 1 or 2 on the Frankl behavior scale)needing special line of treatment through general anesthesia.
2. signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis, spontaneous pain, necrosis or any signs or symptoms of any infection.
3. presence of any radiographic signs of abcess, bone loss, internal or external root resorption.
4. parents or guardians who refuse participating in the study.

Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes