Evaluation of Efficacy of Intraligamentary Anesthesia for Mandibular Molar Extractions
NCT ID: NCT05122819
Last Updated: 2023-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-13
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Anaesthetic injection into the Periodontal ligament space (space between tooth root surface and the bone forming the socket wall) as an alternative to IANB have been tested by many researchers with varying results. The expected advantages of this technique are reduced pain on injection, shorter duration of anaesthesia that prevents inadvertent lips and cheek biting after completion of the procedure. It is expected to be easier to perform in cases of restricted mouth opening and uncooperative patients due to any reason and carry lesser risk of bleeding within tissues.
The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of Intra-ligamentary injection for posterior mandibular molar extraction as an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) so that it can be used in cases where IANB is either difficult to perform or not indicated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Intraligamentary Anesthesia With the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for the Extraction of Mandibular Molars.
NCT06611865
Effectiveness of the Intraligamentary Anesthesia and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Pain During Dental Treatment
NCT04563351
Distolingual Infiltration Verses Conventional Nerve Block in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction
NCT07296926
Comparison of The Effectiveness of Intraligamentary and Mandibular Anesthesia on Mandibular Molar Teeth
NCT05115773
Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anesthesia
NCT05221190
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Intraligamentary Injection by Jet Injector
Mandibular Molar Extraction Under Local Anesthesia
Local Anaesthetic to be used: 2% Lidocaine in 1.8 ml cartridge (regularly used for dental anaesthesia regardless of the technique).
Pain on injection and local anaesthesia success will be checked by using numeric pain rating scale (NPRS).
Group B
Intraligamentary Injection by regular Dental Anesthesia Syringe
Mandibular Molar Extraction Under Local Anesthesia
Local Anaesthetic to be used: 2% Lidocaine in 1.8 ml cartridge (regularly used for dental anaesthesia regardless of the technique).
Pain on injection and local anaesthesia success will be checked by using numeric pain rating scale (NPRS).
Group C
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
Mandibular Molar Extraction Under Local Anesthesia
Local Anaesthetic to be used: 2% Lidocaine in 1.8 ml cartridge (regularly used for dental anaesthesia regardless of the technique).
Pain on injection and local anaesthesia success will be checked by using numeric pain rating scale (NPRS).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mandibular Molar Extraction Under Local Anesthesia
Local Anaesthetic to be used: 2% Lidocaine in 1.8 ml cartridge (regularly used for dental anaesthesia regardless of the technique).
Pain on injection and local anaesthesia success will be checked by using numeric pain rating scale (NPRS).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both genders.
* Teeth selection: Mandibular first and second molars needing extraction under local anaesthesia.
* Healthy patients or those with well controlled systemic disease.
* Patients consenting to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Mandibular third molars, acutely inflamed or infected first and second molars.
* Pregnant patients and those with poorly controlled systemic disease.
* Mentally handicapped patients.
* Patients not consenting to participate in the study.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamdard University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ayesha Basit
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamdard University Dental Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
(21)3-4161310
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.