Analgesic Effects of Extraoral Ultrasound Block of Mandibular Nerve for the Extraction of Lower Third Molars
NCT ID: NCT06009302
Last Updated: 2024-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Distolingual Infiltration Verses Conventional Nerve Block in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction
NCT07296926
Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy in Extraction on Mandibular Molars
NCT03106168
Evaluation of Efficacy of Intraligamentary Anesthesia for Mandibular Molar Extractions
NCT05122819
Comparison of Conventional Buccal Nerve Block Versus Buccal Nerve Trunk Block During Extraction of Posterior Mandibular Teeth
NCT07330518
Effectiveness of the Intraligamentary Anesthesia and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Pain During Dental Treatment
NCT04563351
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Characteristics of alveolar nerve block and US block of the mandibular nerve will becompared, such as: pain during application of anesthesia, amount of anesthetic, duration ofanesthesia, need to use analgesics, time to and level of pain when using analgesics, andcomplications
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
US block of mandibular nerve
Extraoral ultrasound-guided block of the mandibular nerve will be performed iusing an ultrasound device. After visualisation of the pterygomandibular space, of the maxillary artery and the mandibular nerve next to it, at a depth of 2-4 cm, the detection of the maxillary artery is confirmed by Color Doppler. A needle enters between the coronoid and condylar processes, using the "out of plane" technique, near the maxillary artery, and after negative aspiration, local anesthetic ropivacaine (0.75%, 2.5 mL) will be applied.
US guided block of mandibular nerve
Extraoral ultrasound-guided block of the mandibular nerve will be performed in the examined group using an ultrasound device, using ropivacaine (0.75%, 2.5 mL).
intraoral block of lower alveolar nerve
During the intraoral block of the inferior alveolar nerve, the patient will lie with his mouth wide open, and the inferior alveolar, lingual and buccal nerves will be anesthetized using two injections. The anesthetic used will be 40 mg/mL articaine chloride+0.01 mg/mL epinephrine: the planned amount of anesthetic is 2×1.7 mL, and if anesthesia is not achieved, an additional volume of anesthetic will be added as needed, until anesthesia
Intraoral block of lower alveolar nerve
Block of lower alveolar nerve will be applied intraoraly using articaine+adrenaline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
US guided block of mandibular nerve
Extraoral ultrasound-guided block of the mandibular nerve will be performed in the examined group using an ultrasound device, using ropivacaine (0.75%, 2.5 mL).
Intraoral block of lower alveolar nerve
Block of lower alveolar nerve will be applied intraoraly using articaine+adrenaline
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* horizontally placed lower third molars
* ASA I or II group
Exclusion Criteria
* local infection at the site of needle puncture
* parotitis
* serious liver disease
* use of antiarrhythmics group III (eg amiodarone), anticoagulant or antithrombotic drugs
* lactation
* people who took an analgesic as a preventive measure before coming to the procedure
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
OTHER
Varazdin General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Varazdin General Hospital
Varaždin, , Croatia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Khorshidi Khiavi R, Pourallahverdi M, Pourallahverdi A, Ghorani Khiavi S, Ghertasi Oskouei S, Mokhtari H. Pain control following impacted third molar surgery with bupivacaine irrigation of tooth socket: a prospective study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010 Fall;4(4):105-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2010.027. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
Fisher SE, Frame JW, Rout PG, McEntegart DJ. Factors affecting the onset and severity of pain following the surgical removal of unilateral impacted mandibular third molar teeth. Br Dent J. 1988 Jun 11;164(11):351-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806453. No abstract available.
Teoh L, Moses G, McCullough MJ. A review of drugs that contribute to bleeding risk in general dental practice. Aust Dent J. 2020 Jun;65(2):118-130. doi: 10.1111/adj.12751. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Plantevin F, Pascal J, Morel J, Roussier M, Charier D, Prades JM, Auboyer C, Molliex S. Effect of mandibular nerve block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Nov;99(5):708-12. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem242. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
Kumar A, Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumari P, Mukul SK. Ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block and its comparison with conventional analgesics in patients undergoing faciomaxillary surgery: Randomised control trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;62(11):871-875. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_256_18.
Stojanovic S, Buric N, Tijanic M, Todorovic K, Buric K, Buric N, Jovanovic M, Bajagic V. The Assessment of Prolonged Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery by a Perineural Addition of Dexamethasone to 0.5% Ropivacaine: A Randomized Comparison Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031324.
Martinus M, Mihaljevic S, Reiner K, Verzak Z, Panic MK, Strahija A, Gluncic V, Lukic IK, Lukic A. Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block compared to intraoral conductive block of the inferior alveolar nerve after lower third molar alveolectomy: a clinical prospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04787-5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Side effect of glucosaimine to coagulation
The use of analgesics and anti-inflammatories in an oral surgery service in Medellín, Colombia, 2013-2015
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12071987
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.