Comparison of the Computer Controlled and Conventional Local Anesthesia Techniques in Primary Molar Extraction in Children Aged 5 to 9 Years Old

NCT ID: NCT06669039

Last Updated: 2024-11-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-17

Study Completion Date

2024-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess pain perception, child stress level and compare the effectiveness between periodontal ligament anesthesia using Computer-controlled Local Anesthetic delivery system and the Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block during extraction of the primary molars.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is there a difference in pain perception, child stress level and anesthesia effectiveness between the CC-ILA system and the traditional syringe when administering IANB in pediatric patients undergoing primary molar extractions.

Researchers will compare CC-ILA system to traditional syringe when administering IANB to see if there a difference in pain perception, child stress level and anesthesia effectiveness.

Participants will:

Have their lower first primary molar extracted by receiving either periodontal ligament anesthesia using computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or the conventional inferior alveolar nerve bock.

Pain perception during the anesthesia process was measured using both objective criteria through the Sound-Eye-Motor scale and subjective assessment using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. Salivary cortisol level will be used to determine child stress level. The efficacy of anesthesia at various stages of the extraction procedure was evaluated using the Sound-Eye-Motor scale.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Computer-controlled Intraligamentary Anaesthesia Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Pain Perception Anesthesia Effectiveness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Inferior Alveolar nerve block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthesia will be delivered using the conventional syringe

Computer-controlled Intraligamentary local anaesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer-controlled Local Anesthetic delivery system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Local anesthesia will be delivered using Computer-controlled Local Anesthetic delivery system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer-controlled Local Anesthetic delivery system

Local anesthesia will be delivered using Computer-controlled Local Anesthetic delivery system.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Local anesthesia will be delivered using the conventional syringe

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy children (ASA I).
* Ranging in age from 5-9.
* Cooperative (Frankle ++).
* With mandibular first primary molars earmarked for removal owing to factors such as: extensive caries, crown damage, periapical lesions and unsuccessful pulp treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Mobile teeth (Grade III).
* Ankylosed teeth.
* Teeth with root resorption (more than 1\\3).
* Patients with facial cellulitis and when there is a need for supplemental anesthesia
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Abdulaziz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lamia Saleh AlGhamdi

Pediatric Dentist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King AbdulAziz University

Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

109-05-23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.