SleeperOne vs. Conventional Infiltration: Pain Perception in Mandibular Primary Molar Extraction

NCT ID: NCT07156396

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-02

Study Completion Date

2025-09-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial is being conducted in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. The purpose of the study is to compare the pain perception and comfort of children during tooth extraction when using a computer-controlled local anesthetic device (SleeperOne® 5) versus the conventional syringe infiltration technique.

Children between 3 and 5 years of age who require extraction of a maxillary primary molar will be invited to participate. Before starting, a topical anesthetic gel (benzocaine) will be applied. Then, local anesthesia will be given using either the SleeperOne® device or the traditional syringe, depending on the group assigned.

Pain during injection and extraction will be assessed using both child-friendly rating scales and independent evaluation by the dentist. Patient anxiety, heart rate, and blood pressure will also be recorded.

This study aims to provide evidence on whether computer-controlled anesthesia can reduce children's pain and anxiety compared with the conventional method, leading to a more comfortable dental experience.

The study is a randomized clinical trial and will be conducted in a single visit at the Pediatric Dentistry Outpatient Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. The results may help improve pain management and patient comfort during dental treatment for children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the pain perception and anxiety levels associated with the use of a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (SleeperOne®) versus conventional local infiltration using a standard syringe in pediatric patients undergoing extraction of mandibular primary molars.

A total of 28 healthy children aged 3 to 5 years, requiring extraction of at least one mandibular primary molar, will be enrolled and randomly assigned into two parallel groups: the intervention group (SleeperOne®) and the control group (conventional syringe). Both groups will receive the same anesthetic solution: 3% Mepivacaine without vasoconstrictor. Topical anesthesia will be applied using 20% benzocaine gel before injection in all participants.

Pain management during dental treatment in children is a major concern in pediatric dentistry. Traditional infiltration anesthesia using a syringe is effective but often associated with pain, anxiety, and fear, which can negatively affect child cooperation. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) systems, such as the SleeperOne® 5, have been developed to minimize these issues by providing a slow and steady flow of anesthesia with improved ergonomics for the operator.

This randomized clinical trial will compare pain perception during maxillary primary molar extraction in children using the SleeperOne® 5 device versus conventional infiltration with a standard dental syringe. The trial will follow a parallel design with two arms: an intervention group receiving local anesthesia via the SleeperOne® 5, and a control group receiving conventional syringe infiltration.

Participants will be children aged 3-5 years who require extraction of a maxillary primary molar. Topical anesthesia with benzocaine will be applied prior to injection in both groups. Local infiltration will then be administered using either the SleeperOne® 5 or a conventional syringe, depending on group allocation.

The primary outcome is pain perception during injection and extraction, measured subjectively using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) and objectively using the Sound, Eye, and Motor (SEM) scale by an independent, blinded evaluator. Secondary outcomes include patient anxiety, recorded using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS), and physiological responses (heart rate and blood pressure) measured with a digital monitor.

The study is designed with two parallel groups, with an anticipated sample size of 28 children (14 per group), based on a power calculation. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated list. Blinding of participants is not possible due to the nature of the interventions, but outcome assessment will be blinded.

The results of this study are expected to provide clinical evidence on whether CCLAD (SleeperOne® 5) offers a significant advantage over conventional infiltration in reducing pain and anxiety during pediatric dental extractions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Anxiety Pain Pain Management Extraction, Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Infiltration

Children will receive 3% mepivacaine with conventional syringe after 20% benzocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthetic (3% mepivacaine) will be administered using a conventional dental syringe after the application of 20% benzocaine topical anesthetic.

SleeperOne® Device

Children will receive 3% mepivacaine using SleeperOne® device after 20% benzocaine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SleeperOne®, dental Hitec, France

Intervention Type DEVICE

SleeperOne® is a computerized local anesthetic delivery system used to deliver 3% mepivacaine following application of 20% benzocaine topical gel. It is designed to reduce injection pain and improve comfort during pediatric dental procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SleeperOne®, dental Hitec, France

SleeperOne® is a computerized local anesthetic delivery system used to deliver 3% mepivacaine following application of 20% benzocaine topical gel. It is designed to reduce injection pain and improve comfort during pediatric dental procedures.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Infiltration

Local anesthetic (3% mepivacaine) will be administered using a conventional dental syringe after the application of 20% benzocaine topical anesthetic.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children Aged between 3 to 5 years.
* Medically fit children classified as ASA physical status I and II
* Parents acceptance to participate in the study (informed consent)
* Children with teeth diagnostically confirmed to require extraction

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with an allergy to local anesthesia.
* Uncooperative children
* Children requiring general anesthesia
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ameera Alaa Eldin Abdalazim Khalifa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ameera Alaa Eldin Abdalazim Khalifa

MSc Candidate in Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ameera Alaa ElDin, MSc Candidate in Pediatric Den

Role: CONTACT

01156165654

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

Study protocol will be uploaded and publicly accessible upon final approval.

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.dentalhitec.com/

it introduces the sleeper one 5 anesthetic device

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

832025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hyaluronidase Enzymes and Local Anesthesia
NCT06980363 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1
Lidocaine Patch and Lower Third Molar
NCT07330726 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3
Chamomile Gummies and Pediatric Dental Anxiety
NCT07138391 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3