Comparison Between Calisthenics and Plyometrics on School Going Children
NCT ID: NCT06739070
Last Updated: 2025-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
99 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-12
2025-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of calisthenics and plyometric exercises on reducing risk of MSK injuries among school-going children. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Will calisthenics exercises have a better effect on reducing risk of MSK injuries compared to plyometric exercises in school-going children?
* How do these exercise interventions impact functional movements, and musculoskeletal pain improvements in children?
Researchers will compare a calisthenics exercise group, a plyometric exercise group, and a control group (no intervention) to see if there are differences in reducing risk of MSK injuries outcomes.
Participants will:
* Be male school-going children aged 8-12 years.
* Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: calisthenics, plyometric, or control.
* Complete baseline assessments of MSK (Functional Movement Screening and pain).
* Participate in their assigned exercise program 3 times per week for 8 weeks (exercise groups only).
* Complete follow-up assessments of MSK (Functional Movement Screening and pain) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.
* Perform tests for functional movement screening and MSK assessment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined Effects of Calisthenics and Plyometric to Reduce Risk of Musculoskeletal Injuries Among School Going Children
NCT06732687
Comparison Between Plyometrics and Calisthenics on Executive Function in School Going Children
NCT06770192
Effect of 8 Week Plyometric Training on Injury Prevention in Domestic Cricket Players
NCT06212843
Effectiveness of 6 Weeks Plyometric Training on Agility Among University Male Students.
NCT04993937
Functional Training and Dynamic Play Exercise on Gross Motor Skills, Physical Fitness, and Balance in Healthy Children
NCT07005440
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This research study, conducted by Raees Fatima at Riphah International University in Islamabad, aims to investigate how different types of exercise affect cognitive abilities in children. Specifically, it compares the effects of calisthenics (bodyweight exercises) and plyometrics (jump training) on reducing risk of MSK Injuries in school-going children.
Key Details:
* Participants: Male school-going children aged 8-12 years
* Duration: 8 weeks
* Location: Public and private schools in Islamabad, Pakistan
The study will involve three groups:
1. Calisthenics group: Performing bodyweight exercises
2. Plyometric group: Engaging in jumping and explosive movement exercises
3. Control group: No specific exercise intervention
Both exercise groups will participate in supervised sessions three times per week. The exercises are designed to be age-appropriate and safe for children.
Measurements:
Researchers will assess various aspects of executive function using standardized tests:
\- TNMQ'S FMS These assessments will be conducted at the beginning of the study, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks to track changes over time.
Significance:
This study is important because it could provide valuable insights into how different types of exercise reduces risk of MSK Injuries. The results could inform physical education programs in schools and help parents and educators make informed decisions about children's physical activities.
Ethical Considerations:
The study has been approved by the university's ethics review board. Participation is voluntary, and parents must provide informed consent. All data will be kept confidential and coded to protect participants' identities.
Expected Outcomes:
The researchers hypothesize that calisthenics exercises may have a more significant positive effect on reducing risk of MSK Injuries compared to plyometric exercises. However, both exercise types are expected to show improvements compared to the control group.
This research contributes to the growing field of exercise neuroscience and could have practical implications for child development, education, and public health policies related to physical activity in schools.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Calisthenics
Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes. Session would be of 8 minutes in which 1 minutes exercise and 1 minute rest is there. Exercise include bunny jumps, bear crawls , crab walk and mad cat and 9 minutes cool down period. This protocol would be follow up to 8 weeks.
Calisthenics
Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes.. And 9 minutes cool down period. Following Plyometrics would be performed:1 medicine ball squats 2.ABC pushups 3.Medicine ball chest press 4.standing jump reach for star 5.SINGLE leg hops 6.Pushup on knees 7.zig zag double jump
Plyometric
Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes.. And 9 minutes cool down period. Following Plyometrics would be performed:1 medicine ball squats 2.ABC pushups 3.Medicine ball chest press 4.standing jump reach for star 5.SINGLE leg hops 6.Pushup on knees 7.zig zag double jump
Plyometric
Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes.. And 9 minutes cool down period. Following Plyometrics would be performed:1 medicine ball squats 2.ABC pushups 3.Medicine ball chest press 4.standing jump reach for star 5.SINGLE leg hops 6.Pushup on knees 7.zig zag double jump
Control
compare with other groups
Control group (no intervention)
In control group no intervention would be given. Initial test would be performed at 4th and 8th week and then results would be compared with experimental group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plyometric
Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes.. And 9 minutes cool down period. Following Plyometrics would be performed:1 medicine ball squats 2.ABC pushups 3.Medicine ball chest press 4.standing jump reach for star 5.SINGLE leg hops 6.Pushup on knees 7.zig zag double jump
Calisthenics
Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes.. And 9 minutes cool down period. Following Plyometrics would be performed:1 medicine ball squats 2.ABC pushups 3.Medicine ball chest press 4.standing jump reach for star 5.SINGLE leg hops 6.Pushup on knees 7.zig zag double jump
Control group (no intervention)
In control group no intervention would be given. Initial test would be performed at 4th and 8th week and then results would be compared with experimental group.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male School Going Children (8-12 Years Of Age)
* Normal BMI of School Going Children
* No Recent Musculoskeletal Injury from last month.
* Not Actively Engaged In Other Sports
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with acute illness or fracture
* Active Inflammation or infections
* Any physical deformity
8 Years
12 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Waqar Ahmed Awan, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Different Schools
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Riphah/RCRAHS-01924
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.