Intraocular Pressure, Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Optic Perfusion Pressure of Minimal Low and High-Flow Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT06684704

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-15

Study Completion Date

2025-08-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine the effect of minimal low-flow versus high-flow anesthesia on intraocular pressure (IOP) by non-contact tonometry, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) by USG and optic perfusion pressure (OPP) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy operations. He will also learn about the effect on hemodynamic responses and arterial oxygenation. The main questions it aims to answer are:

What are the effects of low-flow anesthesia combined with prone position on intraocular pressure (IOP), optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and optic perfusion pressure (OPP)? Which anesthesia flow type has optimal eye-protective results? The investigators will compare minimal low-flow and high-flow anesthesia.

Participants:

The study will include patients between the ages of 18-60 years with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) risk classification I-II-III, who are scheduled for unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) operation in the Urology Clinic under elective conditions and who have given informed consent.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Today, rapidly depleting resources and deteriorating ecosystems bring the concept of sustainability to the forefront in all areas. Anesthesia applications have also become an important evaluation subject in terms of sustainability. One of the important components of sustainable anesthesia is low-flow anesthesia. Low-flow anesthesia technique is a technique based on the re-breathing of at least half of the gas exhaled in semi-closed systems by returning at least half of the exhaled gas to the patient in the next inspiration (1). This reduces anesthetic gas consumption, reduces the carbon footprint and prevents environmental pollution. In addition, low-flow anesthesia protects mucociliary clearance mechanisms by preventing airway moisture loss and supports the physiological balance of the respiratory system (2). With the widespread use of low-flow anesthesia, research on the systemic effects of this method compared to high-flow anesthesia has also increased. Prone position may lead to undesirable effects such as increased intracranial pressure, increased intraocular pressure, increased cerebral blood flow and atelectasis. Although the effects of this position on intracranial and intraocular pressure are well known, studies on the effect of low-flow anesthesia on these parameters are limited. Therefore, how the use of low-flow anesthesia in combination with the prone position changes these effects should be evaluated in larger-scale studies (3).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Intraocular Pressure Nephrolithiasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Both participants and investigators were blinded to the treatment assignments. The study utilized identical appearing interventions to maintain blinding.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimal Low-Flo Anesthesia

Group M minimal flow (n=30, fresh gas flow 0.5 L/min)

Group Type OTHER

minimal and high flow anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Low-flow anesthesia technique is a technique based on the re-breathing of at least half of the gas exhaled in semi-closed systems by returning at least half of the exhaled gas to the patient in the next inspiration.

High-Flow Anesthesia

Group Y high flow (n=30, fresh gas flow 4 L/min).

Group Type OTHER

minimal and high flow anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Low-flow anesthesia technique is a technique based on the re-breathing of at least half of the gas exhaled in semi-closed systems by returning at least half of the exhaled gas to the patient in the next inspiration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

minimal and high flow anesthesia

Low-flow anesthesia technique is a technique based on the re-breathing of at least half of the gas exhaled in semi-closed systems by returning at least half of the exhaled gas to the patient in the next inspiration.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18-60 years
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) risk classification I-II-III
* Unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) operation

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with drug and alcohol addiction,
* long-term smoking history (at least 1 pack/1 year),
* BMI\>35,
* chronic lung disease,
* cerebrovascular disease,
* severe systemic diseases such as kidney, liver or advanced heart failure .
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Elazıg Fethi Sekin Sehir Hastanesi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital

Elâzığ, Seçiniz, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jang YE, Nam S, Ji SH, Kim EH, Lee JH, Jung JH, Kim HS, Kim JT. Effect of end-tidal carbon dioxide level on the optic nerve sheath diameter measured by transorbital ultrasonography in anesthetized pediatric patients: A randomized trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Jun;32(6):754-763. doi: 10.1111/pan.14437. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35279906 (View on PubMed)

Mermer A, Kozanhan B. Comparison of the effects of low-flow and normal-flow anesthesia on intracranial pressure, cerebral oxygenation and bispectral index in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Sep;27(18):8514-8522. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33776.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37782167 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FSCH-SB-2024/09-46

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Minimal Flow Anesthesia and Infection Risk
NCT07092046 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA