Effects of Ladder Training Versus Plyometric Training Program
NCT ID: NCT06577129
Last Updated: 2024-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Ladder Training Versus Plyometric
NCT06462209
Effects of Plyometrics Versus Conventional Exercises on Speed, Strength, and Injury Prevention in Bowlers.
NCT05695729
Effects of Complex Training in Cricket Fast Bowlers
NCT06292429
Effect of 8 Week Plyometric Training on Injury Prevention in Domestic Cricket Players
NCT06212843
Effects of 8 Week Plyometric Training on Physical Fitness and Technical Skills of Domestic Cricket Players
NCT06155071
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study's goal was to compare the benefits of a plyometric training program vs a ladder training program on the agility, speed, and power of domestic female cricket players. The 42-person research sample was chosen at random. Two groups were created from the sample: group 1 received ladder training, while group 2 received plyometric training. The agility T test, the vertical leap test, and the 30-meter dash test were the result procedures. Following an 8-week course of therapy, the patients' outcome factors were evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ladder training
Participants 21 out of 42 received ladder training.
Ladder training
Players exercised three times a week for sixty minutes apiece on a ladder for eight weeks. The drills were divided into three categories: steady state drills, burst drills, and elastic reaction drills. While steady state training focused on agility and endurance, burst drills were more focused on fast foot movement. Elastic response drills targeted the reactive speed components of the lower leg.
Plyometric training
21 participants out of 42 received ladder training.
Plyometric training
For eight weeks, the players performed a 60-minute plyometric training program three times a week. A fifteen-minute warm-up, stretching, and jogging session comes after the thirty minutes of plyometric training. The cool-down consists of fifteen minutes of light running and stretching.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ladder training
Players exercised three times a week for sixty minutes apiece on a ladder for eight weeks. The drills were divided into three categories: steady state drills, burst drills, and elastic reaction drills. While steady state training focused on agility and endurance, burst drills were more focused on fast foot movement. Elastic response drills targeted the reactive speed components of the lower leg.
Plyometric training
For eight weeks, the players performed a 60-minute plyometric training program three times a week. A fifteen-minute warm-up, stretching, and jogging session comes after the thirty minutes of plyometric training. The cool-down consists of fifteen minutes of light running and stretching.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Only female cricket players.
* Player with minimum 1- year experience of cricket.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lower extremity injuries of last 6 months(fractures, ligament ruptures).
* Players who were unable to complete ladder and plyometric training.
18 Years
25 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sania Akram, MS*
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Riphah International University
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pechlivanos RG, Amiridis IG, Anastasiadis N, Kannas T, Sahinis C, Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Effects of plyometric training techniques on vertical jump performance of basketball players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Jun;24(6):682-692. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12097. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F22C14G79010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.