Association Between Restorative Emergence Profiles and Peri-implant Bone Loss in Different Implant Systems:

NCT ID: NCT06544746

Last Updated: 2024-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-01

Study Completion Date

2024-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is evaluate the association between different emergence profile angulation on marginal bone loss progression around different implant systems (bone level, tissue level and switching platform).

Does different emergence profile angulation have the same effect on peri-implant marginal bone loss? Standardized periapical radiograph that were captured after crown placement on implants will be compared with the new radiographs done after recalling the patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present retrospective study reported the data collected on partially edentulous patients who were restored with fixed implant supported restorations. The implants were inserted in the periodontology department at the Faculty of Dental Medicine at the Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon, from 2012 to 2019. The study protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board at Saint Joseph University of Beirut.

Under the guidance of academic members, all surgical procedures were carried out by postgraduate students. For each implant system, the surgical procedure followed the conventional recommendations. Patients got cemented or screw-retained fixed prostheses after adequate healing time of 3 to 6 months.

Patients were urged to practice proper oral hygiene after receiving their final crown. Even though all patients are told to participate in a regular Supportive periodontal therapy program, some of them did not, they were not selected and excluded in this study Patients or implants were excluded under the following conditions: (a) insufficient clinical records; (b) patients with systemic diseases or conditions; (c) smokers; (d) irregular maintenance care; (e) patients with calculus presence on radiographs; (f) implants placed on reconstructed sites; (g) implant-assisted removable prostheses; (h) peri-implantitis diagnosis; (i) failed implants;(j) Bone loss before prothesis delivery (k) previously treated peri-implantitis cases; and (l)Bone level implants placed supracrestally; (m) lack of intra-oral radiographs taken using the paralleling technique at baseline (the first year of prosthesis insertion) and after 3 years.

Patients were called for reassessment appointments after 3-7 years. After signing the informed consent, measurements by a PCP-15(periondontal probe) probe of plaque index (FMPS) and bleeding on probing (FMBS) are indicated on the form. If the smoking status has changed, it is also mentioned.

For data analysis, the following categories were included: implant connection type (bone-level platform switching, bone-level non platform switching, or tissue level); Emergence Angle (mesial and distal, separately); Emergence Profile (mesial and distal, separately); location; history of periodontitis, abutment height. Radiographic and clinical parameters taken at the time implant placement, after prosthetic delivery, and following a minimum of 3 years follow-up visit were provided.

Single and multiple restorations were included.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant-Abutment Designs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bone level Implants

Marginal bone loss will be assessed according to the emergence profile in each system of implants. Standardized periapical radiograph that were captured after crown placement on implants will be compared with the new radiographs done after recalling the patient.

Periapical radiographs

Intervention Type RADIATION

oral radiographs taken with the paralleling technique and film holders at 1- and 3-years post-prosthesis insertion with an X-ray apparatus equipped with a long cone and a Rinn Universal Collimator (Dentsply RINN, York, PA, USA). All radiographs were stored on a PC and analyzed with the software program DBSWIN software. Each radiograph was calibrated using the implant diameter and length as reference measures to correct any distortion before measurement. An image processing program was employed to quantify peri-implant MBL, the EA, EP.

Tissue Level Implants

Marginal bone loss will be assessed according to the emergence profile in each system of implants. Standardized periapical radiograph that were captured after crown placement on implants will be compared with the new radiographs done after recalling the patient.

Periapical radiographs

Intervention Type RADIATION

oral radiographs taken with the paralleling technique and film holders at 1- and 3-years post-prosthesis insertion with an X-ray apparatus equipped with a long cone and a Rinn Universal Collimator (Dentsply RINN, York, PA, USA). All radiographs were stored on a PC and analyzed with the software program DBSWIN software. Each radiograph was calibrated using the implant diameter and length as reference measures to correct any distortion before measurement. An image processing program was employed to quantify peri-implant MBL, the EA, EP.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Periapical radiographs

oral radiographs taken with the paralleling technique and film holders at 1- and 3-years post-prosthesis insertion with an X-ray apparatus equipped with a long cone and a Rinn Universal Collimator (Dentsply RINN, York, PA, USA). All radiographs were stored on a PC and analyzed with the software program DBSWIN software. Each radiograph was calibrated using the implant diameter and length as reference measures to correct any distortion before measurement. An image processing program was employed to quantify peri-implant MBL, the EA, EP.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have undergone the initial phase followed by implant placement.
* Implants placed and prosthesis delivered for more than 3 years.
* Implants placed in premolar/molar region
* No reconstructive bone procedure done on the site of study
* Presence of opposing occlusion
* Non-smokers

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, drugs that can affect bone metabolism).
* Total edentulousness.
* Inappropriate, unavailable, or distorted x-rays.
* Implants placed at a supra or infra bone level.
* Implants placed immediately after an extraction.
* Poor oral hygiene (High plaque score FMPS control record \> 30%)
* Smokers
* Signs of peri-implantitis development during the first year following functional loading
* Lack or incomplete information regarding peri-implant conditions (clinical and radiographic documentation at the required study time-points)
* Surgical treatment on the study implants during the first 2 years after peri-implantitis diagnosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saint-Joseph University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabriel Menassa, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Saint Joseph University Of Beirut

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Joseph University Of Beirut

Beirut, , Lebanon

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Lebanon

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

USJ-2023-63

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.