The Evaluation of Facial Bone Changes After Early Implant Placement Protocols "Clinically and Radiographically".

NCT ID: NCT06165913

Last Updated: 2023-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-30

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The loss of a single tooth could negatively impact the physiologic occlusion because of the tipping of neighboring teeth and the super-eruption of the opposing teeth. In addition, it compromises the esthetic, especially when anterior teeth are missing, leading to psychological problems such as loss of confidence and avoidance of smiling in public with a defect in phonetics.

Restoration of the missing tooth is achieved in many ways, including removable dental appliances, fixed dental prostheses and dental implants.

Implant placement is classified into different protocols according to the time of placement in relation to the time of extraction. These different protocols are immediate implant placement (type 1) on the day of extraction; early implant placement (type 2) after 4-8 weeks with soft tissue healing; early implant placement (type 3) after 12-16 weeks with partial bone healing; and delayed dental implant placement (type 4) after complete bone healing at least 6 months after tooth extraction the Aim of the work: to evaluate facial bone changes after early implant placement protocols clinically and radiographically.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dental implant is the most reliable option as it replace the natural tooth without affecting the neighboring teeth and preserve the surrounding tooth structure with better functional performance. Implant placement is classified in different protocols according to the time of placement in relation to time of extraction. These Different protocols are immediate implant placement (type 1) on the day of extraction, early implant placement (type 2) after 4-8 weeks with soft tissue healing, early implant placement (type 3) after 12-16 weeks with partial bone healing and delayed dental implant placement (type 4) after complete bone healing at least after 6 months from tooth extraction.

Early Implant placement (type 2) after 4-8 weeks post extraction that allows soft tissue healing, resolution of local pathology, shorter treatment time, increase soft tissue volume makes it easier to manipulate the surgical flaps and enables flap advancement for primary closure.

Early implant placement (type 3) after 12-16 weeks with partial bone healing allow more implant stability than in type 1 and type 2 implant placement. The soft tissues are usually completely recovered, enabling tension free closure of the flap and improves esthetic outcomes. However, bone remodeling is more advanced. Perimplant defects may still be present, but with partial bone healing they are reduced in dimension.

Aim of the Work:

The evaluation of facial bone changes after early implant placement protocols clinically and radiographically.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Loss Dental Implants

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

facial bone loss early implant placement bone changes after implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group (1): Early implant placement(type II) group.

Patients will be scheduled for tooth extraction then performing implant placement between 4-8 weeks later after soft tissue healing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early implant placement(type II)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

in group 1, Tooth extraction will be performed with care to preserve alveolar bone walls. After 4-8 weeks from tooth extraction, dental implant will be placed

Group (2): Early implant placement (type III) group.

Patients will be scheduled for tooth extraction and performing implant placement between 12-16 weeks with partial bone healing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early implant placement (type III)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

in group 2, Tooth extraction will be performed with care to preserve alveolar bone walls. After 12-16 weeks from tooth extraction, dental implant will be placed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early implant placement(type II)

in group 1, Tooth extraction will be performed with care to preserve alveolar bone walls. After 4-8 weeks from tooth extraction, dental implant will be placed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Early implant placement (type III)

in group 2, Tooth extraction will be performed with care to preserve alveolar bone walls. After 12-16 weeks from tooth extraction, dental implant will be placed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients above 20 years old.
2. Patients with hopeless tooth in the maxillary anterior premolar region with socket type I indicated for extraction due to failure endodontic treatment, vertical root fracture, …etc.
3. Patients in good health with no medical contra-indication that would prevent routine oral surgery.
4. Patients with a positive attitude towards oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with relevant medical conditions that may delay healing or compromise implant osseointegration.
2. Presence of risk factors as diabetes or smoking.
3. Pregnant or lactating women.
4. Absence of buccal bone after tooth extraction.
5. Insufficient vertical inter-arch space to accommodate the prostheses.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Ali Abdelkader Radwan

principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rehab F Ghouraba, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tanta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tanta University faculty of dentistry

Tanta, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1993

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id