Accuracy of Computer- Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients.
NCT ID: NCT06277076
Last Updated: 2024-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
13 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-28
2023-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Delayed Implants in Healed Sockets.
NCT04346706
3D Evaluation of Free-handed-Countersink Guided and Fully Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients
NCT07061418
Fully Guided Dental Implant Placement and Primary Stability
NCT07149987
Clinical Evaluation of Implant-secured Removable Partial Denture
NCT02762201
A 36-month Analysis of the Clinical Performance of Individualized CAD/CAM-produced Dental Implants: a Cohort Study
NCT06576284
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nowadays, the use of guided surgery is vastly increasing in a daily dental practice. In the "Era of Digital Dentistry", it is of utmost importance to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the computer-guided techniques in order to determine their limits, avoid risks (adjacent anatomical structures, limited crestal volume, immediate loading), and apply them in safe manner. Evidence-based scientific data on this matter is still deficient. In these terms, the investigators consider it very interesting and of high clinical value for all oral surgeons and dental practitioners to evaluate in a clinical research the precision and distortion of computer-guided implant surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computer Implant guided Surgery
Dental implant placed using printed guide after a digital planification on a superimposed 3D surface scan and a 3D Cone Beam imaging of the jaw.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1 and 2
* Non or Light smoking (\< 10 cigarettes per day)
* Acceptable intermaxillary space (44 mm minimum)
* Minimal crestal width of 5.5mm
* Minimal residual bone height of 10mm above the alveolar nerve canal
Exclusion Criteria
* Bone grafted sites
* Severe bruxism
* Cone Beam Computed tomography with exaggerated artifacts
* Limited intermaxillary space
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saint-Joseph University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emile Chrabieh
Principal investigator, Head of Implant Dentistry Diploma program, Clinical Adjunct Professor.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emile Chrabieh, Master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty at the dental school, oral surgery department, Saint Joseph University of Beirut
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saint Joseph University of Beirut/Dental school
Beirut, , Lebanon
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12897. Epub 2018 May 10.
Li J, Chen Z, Chan HL, Sinjab K, Yu H, Wang HL. Does flap opening or not influence the accuracy of semi-guided implant placement in partially edentulous sites? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1253-1261. doi: 10.1111/cid.12847. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep;21(9):980-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01957.x. Epub 2010 May 24.
van Steenberghe D, Molly L, Jacobs R, Vandekerckhove B, Quirynen M, Naert I. The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready-made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1-year follow-up study on 50 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):360-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x.
Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:416-435. doi: 10.1111/clr.13346.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FMD1234
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.