Clinical Study Investigating the Efficiency and Complications Related to Two Different Procedures Used for the Preparation of Dentures Applied in Patients With Edentulous
NCT ID: NCT05332977
Last Updated: 2022-04-18
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
40 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2022-05-31
Study Completion Date
2028-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The principal aim of the study is to evaluate the prosthetic complications with CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prostheses and denture conversion prostheses after 3 months of function. Supported restorations are now a predictable treatment modality for the rehabilitation of complete and partially edentulous jaws.Immediate loading of the placed implants is performed for the rehabilitation of the edentulous arch to improve patients' function. This can be usually done by converting the existing denture base of the patient or by making a CAD- CAM milled provisional prosthesis integrating digital workflow. A laboratory fabricated denture base can be converted into a screw-retained provisional prosthesis post implant placement. This is known as conversion prosthesis. However, drawbacks of these prostheses include increased chairside time for the clinician leading to inconvenience for the patient and a potential for an error in prosthesis fabrication. With the introduction of CAD-CAM technology, it is now possible to fabricate a provisional restoration using digital workflows. This workflow would help the clinicians save a considerable amount of chairside time and obtain potentially stronger restorations better polished and without contamination of surgical field. Studies assessing the soft tissue response and patient-reported outcome measures between denture conversion and CAD- CAM fabricated provisionals are currently lacking in the literature.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Patients With Peri-implant Disease
NCT02676661
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
UNKNOWN
Evaluation of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Patients With Peri-implant Disease：a Retrospective Study
NCT02662361
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
UNKNOWN
Digital vs Conventional Prosthetic Rehab & Occlusal Analysis in Edentulous Patients
NCT07164066
Edentulous Complete Denture Wearers
Dental Occlusion
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Implant-Abutment Interface Design on Bone and Soft Tissue Levels Around Implants Placed Using Different Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT02953392
Tooth Loss
COMPLETED
NA
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760
Implant Site Reaction
Implant Complication
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Study Intervention and Indication CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prostheses facilitate prosthesis delivery in immediate functional loading protocols. The prostheses are manufactured in the laboratory by milling high-density polymers based on a highly cross-linked polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The prostheses are known to have higher biocompatibility, superior esthetics and soft tissue response as compared to denture conversion prostheses.
The indication is edentulism. CAD-CAM fabricated prostheses are implant supported prosthesis and are indicated for rehabilitation of edentulous arch.
2. Justification of Study Intervention With the introduction of CAD-CAM technology, it is now possible to fabricate a provisional restoration using digital workflows. This workflow would help the clinicians to save a considerable amount of chairside time and to obtain potentially stronger restorations better polished and without contamination of surgical field.
3. Risk / Benefits The participants will be exposed to only minor risks (loosening of prosthesis), as all procedures used in this study for rehabilitation of the patients have been used in dental clinics. The safety and risk profiles are well known. Patients will be locally anesthetized during the procedure of implant placement. Well-experienced dentists who are very familiar with the procedures and materials used will perform the surgeries. On the other hand, a significant gain of knowledge will be expected by the use of CAD-CAM fabricated and denture conversion provisional prostheses. This will open new insights in respect to rehabilitation of the patients undergoing full arch reconstructions. Consequently, this will open new therapeutical opportunities in order to provide the best and most adequate treatment strategy for future patients.
It is ethically justifiable that the patients included in this study will receive the CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis as well as the denture conversion prosthesis as this represents todays standard and most often performed procedure.
Anticipated adverse effects and residual risks encompass loosening of the prosthesis.
4. General Study Design and Justification of the design This study will be designed as monocenter prospective randomized, controlled, clinical trial with two parallel study groups and a follow-up duration of 5 years after insertion of the final prostheses.
Treatment interventions and follow-up:
The edentulous patients recruited in the study will be randomized into the following two groups:
* Placement of tilted implants in the distal most position (group-Til) with straight implants in the anterior region
* Placement of axial implants in the distal most position (group-Axl) with straight implants in the anterior region
Subjects from the above groups will be further divided into following two sub-groups:
* Immediate loading using denture conversion prosthesis (group DC)
* Immediate loading using milled PMMA prosthesis (group CAD-CAM)
5. Methods of Minimising Bias As the implants are clearly distinguishable and require different handling, blinding of the surgeon is not feasible.
The patients will be given questionnaires and they will be asked to answer them before the start of each visit in absence of the investigator or any study site team member.
Additionally, the patients are informed about two different procedures for the fabrication of the provisional prosthesis; however, they are not told about the technical details and which fabrication workflow they have been allocated.
The ease of insertion of the provisional prostheses will be evaluated by an evaluator other than the surgeon. This evaluator will be the same for both prostheses throughout the study.
6. Assignment to Study Group Axial or Tilted implants will be allocated randomly to the patients, so that an equal distribution (1:1) of patients to both treatment groups results. Similarly, patients will be randomly allocated to group DC and group CAD-CAM prosthesis. The randomization sequences will be generated by using a computer-generated list. The study manager or the statistician will generate the allocation sequences and will store them with restricted access. One randomization will be done by the eCRF after uploading the allocation list and the other randomization will be performed by opening sealed envelopes Whenever an investigator enrolls a patient for the study, a subject number (ordered number given by the system with a center identification code) will be assigned to the patient. Subject number will be recorded on the medical record folder of the patient. Subject identification Log will enable direct connection to patient identity. This list will be filed in a folder with limited access only for study members and will be kept on site.
7. Monitoring Institution Due to the minimal risk of the study (all treatments are performed according to the standard of care) no external monitoring is needed.
The quality control will be performed by an internal study monitor of M.A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences. If needed, remote monitoring will be performed by the study management team located in Zurich.
8. Statistical Methods
Hypothesis
The hypothesises of the present RCT are two-fold:
1. There will be no differences in the prosthetic complications of CAD-CAM fabricated provisionals and denture conversion prostheses (DC) when used as provisional prostheses.
2. There will be no difference in the survival rates between tilted and axially placed short implants in distal positions for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with fixed screw-retained prostheses.
Determination of Sample Size Sample size was determined using the percentage of prosthetic complications observed in previous clinical trials, using the formula, n = 2 (Zα+ Zβ)2 p(1-p) d2
where Zα is the z variate of alpha error i.e. a constant with value 1.96, Zβ is the z variate of beta error i.e. a constant with value 0.84, p is the proportion of events
Approximate estimates:
1. 80% power
2. Type I error to be 5%
3. Type II error to be 20%
4. Expected proportion to be 0.17
5. Least detectable error to be 0.35 Substituting the values, n = 2 (2.8)2 \[0.1411\] (0.35)2
n = 18.06
To determine the difference in prosthetic complications of CAD-CAM fabricated interim prosthesis as compared to denture conversion prosthesis within 85% of the true value with 95% confidence, a sample size of 18 per group was determined (alpha=0.05).
Approximately 18 subjects per group need to be taken in the present study. To cater for 10% drop-outs, the sample size was adjusted to 20 per group.
9\. Planned Analyses
Primary outcomes:
The difference in prosthetic complications between the two groups will be compared using Fisher's exact test.
Secondary Analyses
Secondary outcomes:
The difference in implant survival rates will be evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimation.
The difference in technical complications will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test.
Inter group comparison (2 groups) will be done using t-test for peri-implant biological parameters (Probing depth, Plaque control record, Bleeding on probing, marginal bone levels).
Patient-reported outcome measures will be analyzed using Chi-Square test.
Interim Analyses The primary endpoint is at 3 months after BL and the analysis of the data collected up to those visits will be done. No Interim Analysis will be done. However, further analyses will be done after collection of 1-year data, 3- and 5-year data in order to monitor the study outcomes over the time.
10\. Safety During the entire duration of the study, all adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) are to be collected, fully investigated and documented in source documents and case report forms (CRF). Study duration encompasses the time from when the participant signs the informed consent until the last investigation plan-specific procedure has been completed.
AE/SAE incidents will be collected at the regular study visits. All adverse events will be documented in a timely manner throughout the clinical investigation and reported as specified in ISO 14155 8.2.5 and 9.8.
The indication is edentulism. CAD-CAM fabricated prostheses are implant supported prosthesis and are indicated for rehabilitation of edentulous arch.
2. Justification of Study Intervention With the introduction of CAD-CAM technology, it is now possible to fabricate a provisional restoration using digital workflows. This workflow would help the clinicians to save a considerable amount of chairside time and to obtain potentially stronger restorations better polished and without contamination of surgical field.
3. Risk / Benefits The participants will be exposed to only minor risks (loosening of prosthesis), as all procedures used in this study for rehabilitation of the patients have been used in dental clinics. The safety and risk profiles are well known. Patients will be locally anesthetized during the procedure of implant placement. Well-experienced dentists who are very familiar with the procedures and materials used will perform the surgeries. On the other hand, a significant gain of knowledge will be expected by the use of CAD-CAM fabricated and denture conversion provisional prostheses. This will open new insights in respect to rehabilitation of the patients undergoing full arch reconstructions. Consequently, this will open new therapeutical opportunities in order to provide the best and most adequate treatment strategy for future patients.
It is ethically justifiable that the patients included in this study will receive the CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis as well as the denture conversion prosthesis as this represents todays standard and most often performed procedure.
Anticipated adverse effects and residual risks encompass loosening of the prosthesis.
4. General Study Design and Justification of the design This study will be designed as monocenter prospective randomized, controlled, clinical trial with two parallel study groups and a follow-up duration of 5 years after insertion of the final prostheses.
Treatment interventions and follow-up:
The edentulous patients recruited in the study will be randomized into the following two groups:
* Placement of tilted implants in the distal most position (group-Til) with straight implants in the anterior region
* Placement of axial implants in the distal most position (group-Axl) with straight implants in the anterior region
Subjects from the above groups will be further divided into following two sub-groups:
* Immediate loading using denture conversion prosthesis (group DC)
* Immediate loading using milled PMMA prosthesis (group CAD-CAM)
5. Methods of Minimising Bias As the implants are clearly distinguishable and require different handling, blinding of the surgeon is not feasible.
The patients will be given questionnaires and they will be asked to answer them before the start of each visit in absence of the investigator or any study site team member.
Additionally, the patients are informed about two different procedures for the fabrication of the provisional prosthesis; however, they are not told about the technical details and which fabrication workflow they have been allocated.
The ease of insertion of the provisional prostheses will be evaluated by an evaluator other than the surgeon. This evaluator will be the same for both prostheses throughout the study.
6. Assignment to Study Group Axial or Tilted implants will be allocated randomly to the patients, so that an equal distribution (1:1) of patients to both treatment groups results. Similarly, patients will be randomly allocated to group DC and group CAD-CAM prosthesis. The randomization sequences will be generated by using a computer-generated list. The study manager or the statistician will generate the allocation sequences and will store them with restricted access. One randomization will be done by the eCRF after uploading the allocation list and the other randomization will be performed by opening sealed envelopes Whenever an investigator enrolls a patient for the study, a subject number (ordered number given by the system with a center identification code) will be assigned to the patient. Subject number will be recorded on the medical record folder of the patient. Subject identification Log will enable direct connection to patient identity. This list will be filed in a folder with limited access only for study members and will be kept on site.
7. Monitoring Institution Due to the minimal risk of the study (all treatments are performed according to the standard of care) no external monitoring is needed.
The quality control will be performed by an internal study monitor of M.A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences. If needed, remote monitoring will be performed by the study management team located in Zurich.
8. Statistical Methods
Hypothesis
The hypothesises of the present RCT are two-fold:
1. There will be no differences in the prosthetic complications of CAD-CAM fabricated provisionals and denture conversion prostheses (DC) when used as provisional prostheses.
2. There will be no difference in the survival rates between tilted and axially placed short implants in distal positions for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with fixed screw-retained prostheses.
Determination of Sample Size Sample size was determined using the percentage of prosthetic complications observed in previous clinical trials, using the formula, n = 2 (Zα+ Zβ)2 p(1-p) d2
where Zα is the z variate of alpha error i.e. a constant with value 1.96, Zβ is the z variate of beta error i.e. a constant with value 0.84, p is the proportion of events
Approximate estimates:
1. 80% power
2. Type I error to be 5%
3. Type II error to be 20%
4. Expected proportion to be 0.17
5. Least detectable error to be 0.35 Substituting the values, n = 2 (2.8)2 \[0.1411\] (0.35)2
n = 18.06
To determine the difference in prosthetic complications of CAD-CAM fabricated interim prosthesis as compared to denture conversion prosthesis within 85% of the true value with 95% confidence, a sample size of 18 per group was determined (alpha=0.05).
Approximately 18 subjects per group need to be taken in the present study. To cater for 10% drop-outs, the sample size was adjusted to 20 per group.
9\. Planned Analyses
Primary outcomes:
The difference in prosthetic complications between the two groups will be compared using Fisher's exact test.
Secondary Analyses
Secondary outcomes:
The difference in implant survival rates will be evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimation.
The difference in technical complications will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test.
Inter group comparison (2 groups) will be done using t-test for peri-implant biological parameters (Probing depth, Plaque control record, Bleeding on probing, marginal bone levels).
Patient-reported outcome measures will be analyzed using Chi-Square test.
Interim Analyses The primary endpoint is at 3 months after BL and the analysis of the data collected up to those visits will be done. No Interim Analysis will be done. However, further analyses will be done after collection of 1-year data, 3- and 5-year data in order to monitor the study outcomes over the time.
10\. Safety During the entire duration of the study, all adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) are to be collected, fully investigated and documented in source documents and case report forms (CRF). Study duration encompasses the time from when the participant signs the informed consent until the last investigation plan-specific procedure has been completed.
AE/SAE incidents will be collected at the regular study visits. All adverse events will be documented in a timely manner throughout the clinical investigation and reported as specified in ISO 14155 8.2.5 and 9.8.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Edentulous Maxilla
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
The edentulous patients recruited in the study will be randomized into the following two groups:
* Placement of tilted implants in the distal most position (group-Til) with straight implants in the anterior region
* Placement of axial implants in the distal most position (group-Axl) with straight implants in the anterior region
Subjects from the above groups will be further divided into following two sub-groups:
* Immediate loading using denture conversion prosthesis (group DC)
* Immediate loading using milled PMMA prosthesis (group CAD-CAM)
* Placement of tilted implants in the distal most position (group-Til) with straight implants in the anterior region
* Placement of axial implants in the distal most position (group-Axl) with straight implants in the anterior region
Subjects from the above groups will be further divided into following two sub-groups:
* Immediate loading using denture conversion prosthesis (group DC)
* Immediate loading using milled PMMA prosthesis (group CAD-CAM)
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Participants
As the placement of implants and the type of implant is clearly distinguishable and require different handling, blinding of the prosthodontist is not feasible.
Patients are blinded to the type of implant received and to the type of procedure followed for the fabrication of the provisional prosthesis.
Patients are blinded to the type of implant received and to the type of procedure followed for the fabrication of the provisional prosthesis.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prothesis
Insertion of CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis (CAD-CAM) on axially placed or titled implants for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Insertion of CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis (CAD-CAM) on axially placed or titled implants for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla
Insertion of denture conversion (DC)
Insertion of denture conversion (DC) provisional prosthesis on axially placed or titled implants for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
DC (denture conversion) provisional prosthesis
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Insertion of denture conversion (DC) provisional prosthesis on axially placed or titled implants for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis
Insertion of CAD-CAM fabricated provisional prosthesis (CAD-CAM) on axially placed or titled implants for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla
Intervention Type
DEVICE
DC (denture conversion) provisional prosthesis
Insertion of denture conversion (DC) provisional prosthesis on axially placed or titled implants for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Patients should be of minimum 18 years to be included in the study.
* Patient with edentulous maxilla
* Presence of natural teeth or dentures in the mandibular arch
* Presence of adequate primary stability during implant placement.
* Adequate bone volume to place at least 4 implants with regular platform of at least 6 mm in length
* Presence of at least 6mm (height) of bone in the distal most prosthetic position (in the region of 2nd premolar or 1st molar)
* Presence of at least 8 mm (height) and 6 mm (width) of bone in the anterior region (canine or lateral incisor) to place an implant of a regular diameter and a minimum length of 8 mm.
* Presence of healed maxillary edentulous ridge (at least 3 months post extraction)
* Written informed consent
* Patient with edentulous maxilla
* Presence of natural teeth or dentures in the mandibular arch
* Presence of adequate primary stability during implant placement.
* Adequate bone volume to place at least 4 implants with regular platform of at least 6 mm in length
* Presence of at least 6mm (height) of bone in the distal most prosthetic position (in the region of 2nd premolar or 1st molar)
* Presence of at least 8 mm (height) and 6 mm (width) of bone in the anterior region (canine or lateral incisor) to place an implant of a regular diameter and a minimum length of 8 mm.
* Presence of healed maxillary edentulous ridge (at least 3 months post extraction)
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Self reported history of bruxism
* Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\>7.5 mg/dl)
* History of irradiation in the head and neck region
* Inability to comply with annual implant maintenance follow up
* Ridge profile not allowing the placement of a fixed prostheses.
* Presence of any uncontrolled systemic disease that contraindicates implant placement.
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\>7.5 mg/dl)
* History of irradiation in the head and neck region
* Inability to comply with annual implant maintenance follow up
* Ridge profile not allowing the placement of a fixed prostheses.
* Presence of any uncontrolled systemic disease that contraindicates implant placement.
* Pregnant or lactating women
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ITI Foundation
INDUSTRY
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Zurich
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M.A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics
Pune, , India
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
India
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAD-CAM vs DC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Implant Rehabilitations in a Hospital Setting
NCT07332195
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Effect of Implant Treatment and/or Dietary Advice on the Nutrition of Edentulous Ageing Subjects
NCT05334407
RECRUITING
NA
Immediate Loading of Implants in the Partially or Completely Edentulous Jaw
NCT02661412
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Minimal Invasive Rehabilitation of Tooth Loss in the Anterior Segment
NCT01997827
WITHDRAWN
NA
Partially-guided Protocol for Maxillary Overdentures Retained by Ti-Zr One-piece Mini Implants
NCT06081192
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Evaluation of Immediately Placed Dental Implants With Local Application of Injectable PRF in Periodontally Compromised Sites
NCT04029779
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Effectiveness of Removable Prosthesis Retained by 4 Implant-supported Locator-Attachments
NCT02380404
COMPLETED
Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Class 1 Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06666595
RECRUITING
NA
Denture Retention of Intra-orally Scanned Versus Extra-orally Scanned Digitally Printed Maxillary Denture in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT07290322
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
3D Evaluation of the Lip Support in a Full-arch Implant-supported Rehabilitations
NCT06052501
RECRUITING
Conventional Versus 3D Printing Duplication Techniques of Complete Denture
NCT06588140
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency Between Complete Denture With Zero-degree Teeth and Anatomic Teeth in Patients With Severely Resorbed Ridge
NCT02359955
UNKNOWN
NA
Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia or PFM
NCT04713800
RECRUITING
NA
Evaluation of Three Hard Relining Materials in Complete Dentures
NCT02203279
COMPLETED
NA
Occlusion and Disocclusion Time in Immediately Loaded Overdentures Supported by Two Splinted Versus Non Splinted Interforaminal Implants
NCT06376019
COMPLETED
NA
Outcome of Implant-supported Overdentures
NCT03777748
UNKNOWN
NA
Implant Retained Rehabilitation With Surgical and Prosthetic Digital Workflow
NCT04066309
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Accuracy of Fully Guided Versus Half Guided Implant
NCT06542562
COMPLETED
NA
Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses
NCT02220764
COMPLETED
NA
Accuracy of Computer- Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients.
NCT06277076
COMPLETED
A Study of Early Loading of Implants in the Maxillary Anterior Region With Alveolar Bone Defects
NCT06068231
UNKNOWN
NA
Evaluation Clinical and Radiographic Images in Dental Implants Rehabilitated With Overdentures
NCT02511977
COMPLETED
Assessment of Customized 3D Zirconium Versus Titanium Mesh for Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Delayed Implant Placement
NCT06933030
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Computer Assisted Implant Surgery and Immediate Loading
NCT01866696
COMPLETED
NA
Prosthetic Complications of Screw Retained Restoration
NCT03674554
UNKNOWN
NA