Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-01
2025-04-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791
Comparing Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Maxillary Implants: Extraoral vs. Intraoral Techniques
NCT06669065
Accuracy of Computer Guided Four Implants Placement in Completely Edentulous Mandible
NCT06571968
Computer Guided Versus Freehand Dental Implant Surgery
NCT06204692
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This will be a Split mouth randomized controlled trial (RCT) study. 16 patients missing teeth in the maxillary (upper) jaw and eligible for dental implant treatment will be recruited.
Interventions will be randomly assigned to the right or the left side of the arch :
Group 1 will undergo fully guided dental implant surgery. Group 2 will undergo partially guided dental implant surgery.
Study Duration:
The total duration of the study is estimated to be 5 months. Recruitment and enrollment of patients: 1 months Dental implant surgery : 3 months Data analysis and manuscript preparation: 1 months
The key steps are:
Recruit 16 eligible patients missing teeth in the maxillary jaw. Randomly assign right or left side of the maxillary arch of patients to either the fully guided or partially guided implant surgery group.
Perform CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) scans before and after the implant surgery for both groups.
Assess the accuracy of implant placement in both groups using the CBCT data. Conduct statistical analysis to determine if there are any statistically significant differences in implant placement accuracy between the two groups.
Interpret the results and develop recommendations on the optimal guided surgery technique for rehabilitating the edentulous maxilla using dental implants.
The study aims to provide scientific evidence to guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate guided surgery approach for maxillary implant rehabilitation
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 will undergo fully guided dental implant surgery
Group 1 will undergo fully guided dental implant surgery
guided implant placement
The key difference is that in Group 1, the guide is only used for the drilling sequence, while in Group 2 the guide is used for both the drilling and the actual implant placement.
Group 2 will undergo half guided dental implant surgery
Group 2 will undergo half guided dental implant surgery. Where the implant will be placed after removal of the guide
guided implant placement
The key difference is that in Group 1, the guide is only used for the drilling sequence, while in Group 2 the guide is used for both the drilling and the actual implant placement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
guided implant placement
The key difference is that in Group 1, the guide is only used for the drilling sequence, while in Group 2 the guide is used for both the drilling and the actual implant placement.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Complete edentulism
* Adequate bone volume to accommodate six standard implant fixtures (3.7 mm diameter and 10 mm length)
* All patients underwent a panoramic X-ray and an oral examination
* Written consent provided prior to participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Insufficient bone volume for a 3.7 mm diameter and 10 mm length implant fixture
* Local or systemic conditions that could impede dental implant surgery
* Patients who smoke more than five cigarettes per day
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MSA University
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alqutaibi AY, Al-Gabri RS, Ibrahim WI, Elawady D. Trueness of fully guided versus partially guided implant placement in edentulous maxillary rehabilitation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Oct 27;25(1):1680. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-07073-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMSA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.