Implant Stability Using Densah Bur Versus Expander

NCT ID: NCT03613415

Last Updated: 2018-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

evaluating use of Densah bur in thin ridge enhance implant's primary stability when compared to screw expander.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Missing Maxillary Premolar

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
* Each patient will be given a code by the researcher (T.A.) and the observers will be blind to which group this case belong.
* Patients, evaluators and statistician will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Expansion by Densah bur

* Scrubbing and draping of the patient in a standard fashion for intra oral procedures followed by local anesthesia administration to the patient.
* A mid crestal flap will be reflected.
* For both groups the implant manufacturer's pilot drill will be used to perform a standard osteotomy of 10 mm depth.
* Sequential use of Densah bur under copious irrigation.
* An implant of 3.9\*10 mm will be inserted.
* Smart peg will be placed on implant and Osstell will be used to record ISQ.
* Healing collars will be placed on implants.
* Flap will be prepared for closure and suturing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Expansion

Intervention Type OTHER

non invasive technique to increase thickness of thin ridge

Expander

Scrubbing and draping of the patient in a standard fashion for intra oral procedures followed by local anesthesia administration to the patient.

* A mid crestal flap will be reflected.
* For both groups the implant manufacturer's pilot drill will be used to perform a standard osteotomy of 10 mm depth.
* Sequential use of screw expanders.
* An implant of 3.9\*10 mm will be inserted.
* Smart peg will be placed on implant and Osstell will be used to record ISQ.
* Healing collars will be placed on implants.
* Flap will be prepared for closure and suturing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Expansion

Intervention Type OTHER

non invasive technique to increase thickness of thin ridge

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Expansion

non invasive technique to increase thickness of thin ridge

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with partial edentulous maxillary premolar area with crestal thickness ranging from 4 to 6 mm.
* Age 25 - 50 years.
* No intraoral soft tissue or hard tissue pathosis.
* No systemic condition contraindicating implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria

* Ridges thickness less than 4 mm.
* Coexisting vertical defect.
* Heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes per day).
* Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
* Patient with psychiatric problems.
* History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Hisham Mahmoud Riad

Principal Investigator (doctor)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed H Mahmoud

Role: CONTACT

00201001029723

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Aug;64(2):185-94. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2202818 (View on PubMed)

Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Sep;50(3):399-410. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(83)80101-2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6352924 (View on PubMed)

Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Dec;6(4):227-31. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8603114 (View on PubMed)

Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7246093 (View on PubMed)

Marquezan M, Osorio A, Sant'Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21635560 (View on PubMed)

Trisi P, De Benedittis S, Perfetti G, Berardi D. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):567-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02036.x. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21087320 (View on PubMed)

Turkyilmaz I, Aksoy U, McGlumphy EA. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18384409 (View on PubMed)

Adell R, Lekholm U, Grondahl K, Branemark PI, Lindstrom J, Jacobsson M. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Fall;5(3):233-46.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2098327 (View on PubMed)

Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):150-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00978.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15085870 (View on PubMed)

Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):299-307. doi: 10.11607/prd.1407.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23593623 (View on PubMed)

Menoni A, Bernardello F, Spinato S, Zaffe D. Full-arch vertical reconstruction of an extremely atrophic mandible with "box technique". A novel surgical procedure: a clinical and histologic case report. Implant Dent. 2013 Feb;22(1):2-7. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318278fa1c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23287979 (View on PubMed)

Khoury, F. and Khoury, C.H., 2007. Mandibular bone block grafts: diagnosis, instrumentation, harvesting techniques and surgical procedures. In Bone augmentation in oral implantology. Quintessence, Berlin.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Nov-Dec;12(6):767-76.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9425757 (View on PubMed)

Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(6):462-73.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1298734 (View on PubMed)

Takahashi T, Funaki K, Shintani H, Haruoka T. Use of horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement in a narrow alveolar ridge: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):291-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15101603 (View on PubMed)

Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984 Jun;73(6):933-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198406000-00014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6374708 (View on PubMed)

Felice P, Pistilli R, Lizio G, Pellegrino G, Nisii A, Marchetti C. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Oct;11 Suppl 1:e69-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00212.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19681938 (View on PubMed)

Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Troger M, Kloss F, Neukam FW. Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Oct;12(5):495-502. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120510.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11564110 (View on PubMed)

Young VL, Schuster RH, Harris LW. Intracerebral hematoma complicating split calvarial bone-graft harvesting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Oct;86(4):763-5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199010000-00029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2217594 (View on PubMed)

Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994 Feb;15(2):152, 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8055503 (View on PubMed)

Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Apr;30(2):207-29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3516738 (View on PubMed)

Demarosi F, Leghissa GC, Sardella A, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Localised maxillary ridge expansion with simultaneous implant placement: a case series. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;47(7):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.11.012. Epub 2009 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19150155 (View on PubMed)

Flanagan D. Labyrinthine concussion and positional vertigo after osteotome site preparation. Implant Dent. 2004 Jun;13(2):129-32. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000127527.44561.b8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15179088 (View on PubMed)

Siddiqui AA, Sosovicka M. Lateral bone condensing and expansion for placement of endosseous dental implants: a new technique. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(2):87-94. doi: 10.1563/786.1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16704111 (View on PubMed)

Cortes AR, Cortes DN. Nontraumatic bone expansion for immediate dental implant placement: an analysis of 21 cases. Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):92-7. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181d46f46.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20386211 (View on PubMed)

Lee EA, Anitua E. Atraumatic ridge expansion and implant site preparation with motorized bone expanders. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;18(1):17-22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16805345 (View on PubMed)

Nishioka RS, Souza FA. Bone spreading and standardized dilation of horizontally resorbed bone: technical considerations. Implant Dent. 2009 Apr;18(2):119-25. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318198e517.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19359862 (View on PubMed)

Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000358.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26584202 (View on PubMed)

Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19522976 (View on PubMed)

Todisco M, Trisi P. Bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry are statistically related. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):898-904.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16392347 (View on PubMed)

Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27741329 (View on PubMed)

Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, Alifarag AM, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, Bowers MM, Cuppini M, Freitas H, Witek L, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Oct;63:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27341291 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Expansion by densah bur

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.