Evaluation of the Dimensional Alveolar Bone Changes in Immediate Post Extraction Implant Placement
NCT ID: NCT06515509
Last Updated: 2024-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-16
2024-07-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques
NCT06599112
Crestal Bone Level After Allogenic Bone Ring With Simultaneous Dental Implant Placement
NCT03906591
Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol
NCT06992557
Comparing the Secondary Stability of Dental Implants: Immediate Gradual Loading Versus Early Loading Protocol in Posterior Maxilla
NCT02309125
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate Implants with loading
immediate implant placement with or without loading
immediate implant placement with or without loading
Immediate Implants without loading
immediate implant placement with or without loading
immediate implant placement with or without loading
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
immediate implant placement with or without loading
immediate implant placement with or without loading
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2\. Patients with healthy systemic condition. 3. Patients aged from 20 to 45 years old. 4. Buccal bone thickness should be at least 1mm. (Morton et al., 2014) 5. Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.(Morton et al., 2014) 6. Good oral hygiene.(Wiesner et al., 2010) 7. Accepts one year follow-up period (cooperative patients) Patient provides an informed consent.
8\. Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement. 9. Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion)
Exclusion Criteria
3\. Current and former smokers (Lambert, Morris and Ochi, 2000) 4. Pregnant females.
25 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Osama Atef Elshahat Attia
Dr. Osama Atef
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):67-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065.
Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776.
AlQahtani SM. A novel method of assessment of BMD using CBCT for implant placement: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34203. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034203.
Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):545-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.x.
Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):743-54.
Bhola M, Neely AL, Kolhatkar S. Immediate implant placement: clinical decisions, advantages, and disadvantages. J Prosthodont. 2008 Oct;17(7):576-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00359.x. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
Mantena SR, Sivagami G, Gottumukkala SN. Evaluation of crestal bone loss and stability of immediate functional loading versus immediate non-functional loading of single-mandibular posterior implants: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Sep;11(5):585-91.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-7-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.