Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement

NCT ID: NCT06760442

Last Updated: 2026-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Statement of problem: The stability of peri-implant bone is a crucial factor for the long-term success of dental implants, where crestal bone plays a significant role in both the primary as well as the long- term implant stability. A bone loss of 1.5 mm during the first year of loading has been acceptable according to the early standards. However, more bone stability can be expected with the development in implant designs and surfaces over the past decades.

Aim of the study: the aim of this study is to radiographically assess the crestal bone changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular previously augmented posterior sites, comparing cases with equicrestal implant placement with subcrestal implant placement

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Statement of problem: The stability of peri-implant bone is a crucial factor for the long-term success of dental implants, where crestal bone plays a significant role in both the primary as well as the long- term implant stability. A bone loss of 1.5 mm during the first year of loading has been acceptable according to the early standards. However, more bone stability can be expected with the development in implant designs and surfaces over the past decades.

Aim of the study: the aim of this study is to radiographically assess the crestal bone changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular previously augmented posterior sites, comparing cases with equicrestal implant placement with subcrestal implant placement.

Materials and methods: This prospective, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial will have 36 participants who need implant placement at the posterior mandibular area where they previously received horizontal bone augmentation. They will be randomly allocated into 2 groups, where group A (test) will receive dental implant placed subcrestally and group B (control) will receive implant placed equicrestally. Crestal bone loss will be assessed by periapical radiographs at implant placement (T0), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T6), 12 months (T12) and 18 months (T18) following implant placement. Keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness will be measured clinically by periodontal probe at the same time points. Buccal bone changes will be evaluated at 18 months compared with the preoperative cone beam computed tomography by fusion module. Patient satisfaction will be recorded at the end of the trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Therapy Augmentation, Alveolar Ridge

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants will not know whether the implant is placed crestal or subcrestal Outcome assessor (primary and secondary outcomes) \& biostatistician will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Subcrestal implant placement

Delayed implant placement 2 mm subcrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Subcrestal implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Delayed implant placement 2 mm subcrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Crestal implant placement

Delayed implant placement equicrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Crestal implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Delayed implant placement equicrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Subcrestal implant placement

Delayed implant placement 2 mm subcrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Crestal implant placement

Delayed implant placement equicrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 21 years.
* Patients having augmented (by 50/50 particulate xenograft and autogenous bone) edentulous posterior site with vertical bone height of \> 10 mm in the mandible with a width of ridge ≥ 7 mm

* Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement
* Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion).
* Good oral hygiene.•Accepts 18 months follow-up period (cooperative patient)
* The patient provides informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with inadequate bone volume and/ or quality
* Patients with remaining roots or with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
* Patients having systemic conditions that interfere with normal wound healing
* Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits .
* Smoker patients.
* Pregnant women.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Misr International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

hani el nahas professor, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Misr International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Misr International University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hani El Nahas Professor, Professor

Role: CONTACT

01221334637

Zainab Hafez Abdel Rahman, Lecturer

Role: CONTACT

+0201221334637

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

hani el Nahs professor, professor

Role: primary

01221334637

Suzy nabil Phd, Phd

Role: backup

01224785645

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Crestal Bone Changes

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.