Apico-coronal Position of Tissue-level Implants Bone Stability
NCT ID: NCT05363306
Last Updated: 2022-05-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-01
2022-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Soft Tissue Width and Abutment Height Influence Peri-implant Bone Resorption
NCT03229005
The Influence of Implant Position on the Occurrence of Biological Complications
NCT05358782
Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement
NCT06760442
Trans-gingival or Subcrestal Short Implants Posterior Maxilla Bone Changes
NCT05975138
Study to Evaluate Bone and Gum Dimension Changes Around Dental Implants Placed in Different Positions in Bone.
NCT01759537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Biological width formation is the main factor influencing peri-implant marginal bone adaptive processes prior to prosthesis delivery. When an implant gets exposed to the oral cavity, soft tissues establish a cuff-like barrier sealing the trans-epithelial component of the fixture.
Differently from equicrestal and subcrestal implants, which present a microgap between implant and abutment at the marginal bone level, tissue-level implants have no gap at this region.
The present multicenter prospective study aims to evaluate if EMBL occurring around tissue-level dental implants before prosthesis delivery may be reduced by adapting apico-coronal positioning in relation to supracrestal tissue thickness.
All patients are treated according to one-stage implant. Sutures are removed 12-14 days after surgery. No removable prostheses are utilized during the healing period.
Final impressions were taken five months after the implant placement. After functional and aesthetic try-in, a single-unit screw-retained metal ceramic crown is delivered. The fixation screw was torqued to 30Ncm following manufacturer's guidelines. Screw access is then closed using light-cured composite resin.
Radiographic measurements. Digital radiographs, customized for each patient with a bite jig, are taken using a long-cone paralleling technique with a film holder at the time of implant placement (baseline, T0), 3 months after implant placement (T1), and 5 months after implant placement, immediately before impression taking (T2). All radiographs are performed using the same x-ray generator technology, set with the same parameters (60 kV, 7 mA).
Two different types of bone changes are calculated, as suggested elsewhere.
1. Early marginal bone loss (EMBL) is calculated.
2. Bone Loss Exposing Implant Surface (BLEIS) is calculated as the difference between the EMBL measurement and the 3 mm length of the transmucosal, machined portion of the implant.
Radiographs demonstrating any deformation, darkness and/or other problem are immediately repeated. All measurements are made by a single calibrated examiner, blind to mucosal thickness, using a 30-inch led-backlit color diagnostic display with Kodak Digital Imaging Software. Each measurement is repeated three times at three different time points as proposed by Gomez-Roman and Launer. Intra-examiner and inter-examiner concordances are 96.1% and 90.4%, respectively, for linear measurements within ±0.1mm.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
thin crestal mucosa
Based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement, implants were placed: 2mm below the crestal bone in presence of thin mucosa (\< 2.5mm)
implant insertion
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement.
Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component.
medium crestal mucosa
Based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement, implants were placed: 2) 1mm below the crestal bone in presence of medium mucosa (2.5-3.5mm);
implant insertion
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement.
Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component.
thick crestal mucosa
Based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement, implants were placed: 1) at crestal level in presence of thick mucosa (\> 3.5 mm);
implant insertion
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement.
Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
implant insertion
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement.
Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* presence of keratinized mucosa with a minimum bucco-lingual width of 3 mm;
* bone crest with at least 6mm of width and 9 mm of height above the mandibular canal without concomitant or previous bone augmentation procedures;
* presence of the opposing dentition
Exclusion Criteria
* uncontrolled periodontitis
* medication consumption for at least 3 months prior to treatment
* history of head or neck radiation therapy
* pregnancy or lactating at any time during the study
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Piezosurgery Academy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Teresa Lombardi, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hesire dental office
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hesire
Cassano Allo Ionio, CS, Italy
Piezosurgery Academy
Parma, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lombardi T, Berton F, Salgarello S, Barbalonga E, Rapani A, Piovesana F, Gregorio C, Barbati G, Di Lenarda R, Stacchi C. Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study. J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 4;8(8):1168. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081168.
Spinato S, Bernardello F, Stacchi C, Soardi CM, Messina M, Rapani A, Lombardi T. Marginal Bone Changes Around Tissue-Level Implants After Prosthesis Delivery: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70071. doi: 10.1111/cid.70071.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TLMBS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.