The Influence of Implant Position on the Occurrence of Biological Complications
NCT ID: NCT05358782
Last Updated: 2022-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
130 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-04-06
2023-02-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Will be included 45 implants with peri-implantitis and 135 healthy implants regardless of the corresponding number of patients . Descriptive statistics will be provided by means of mean values and standard deviations. Correlation between baseline parameters and outcomes will be measured through regression analysis, being the independent variable the occurrence of peri-implantitis. Multilevel analysis will be performed.
For all the analysis, the level of significance was set at p\<0.05.
For sample size calculation the investigators have considered alpha = .05, power = 80% and a proportion between controls and cases of 3:1. The investigators hypothesized a detection of an effect of malposition with a proportion of 0.25 of exposes in control group and 0.5 in test group. the investigators decided to include 45 implants with peri-implantitis and 135 healthy implants, after augmenting the numbers hypothesizing a maximum of 10% dropouts. The proportion of exposed are estimated on the basis of the study published by Yi et al. in 2020 .
The calculation was performed using the method proposed by Schoenfeld.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Apico-coronal Position of Tissue-level Implants Bone Stability
NCT05363306
Buccal and Palatal Bone Thickness and Marginal Bone Changes Implants
NCT05632172
Soft Tissue Width and Abutment Height Influence Peri-implant Bone Resorption
NCT03229005
Effect of Implant Position on Clinical Outcomes
NCT06166316
Impact of Buccal Bone Thickness on Pathological Peri-implant Bone Loss: A 3-year Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02939222
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* presence of signs of inflammation (bleeding and / or suppuration after probing);
* radiographic bone loss in addition to crestal bone resorption caused by initial remodeling or, in the absence of radiography at one year, bone level positioned ≥ 3 mm apically to the most coronal portion of the intraosseous portion of the implant body;
* presence of increased probing depth as compared to previous measurements, if available.
Implant malposition will be defined on the basis of the following parameters:
* criteria proposed by Buser and coworkers in 2004: at least 1.5 - 2 mm between implant neck and adjacent tooth (mesio-distal); ii) at least 1 mm of apico-coronal distance between implant neck and the Cemento-enamel Junction (CEJ) of adjacent teeth (no more than 2.5 mm); iii) at least 3 mm between the necks of two adjacent implants.
* inclination of the implant axis as compared the axis of adjacent teeth (both mesial and distal if present)
* characteristics of the prosthesis (emergency profile, presence of cantilevers, imprecise implant-abutment connection)
The following parameters will be collected from clinical records:
* implant-related factors: implant type, length, diameter, and type of implant-abutment connection, implant surface, vertical position of the implant (distance between implant neck and the bone level at the time of intervention (I-BC) (periapical radiograph)), distance between the implant neck margin and adjacent teeth (on periapical radiographs) (I-MT, I-DT \[I-MI, I-DI\]), distance between implant neck and the projection of CEJ of adjacent teeth (periapical radiographs) (I-MT-CEJ, I-DT-CEJ), the angle between the projection of the implant axis and the axis of adjacent teeth or implant.
* patient-related factors: age, gender, smoking status, systemic disease, medications, presence of periodontal disease at the time of intervention (severity), history of periodontal disease, bruxism;
* site-related factors: implant position / site, bone quantity / quality following the Lekholm and Zarb classification;
* prosthesis-related factors (to be evaluated using the radiographs taken after placement of the prosthesis): single crown, partial fixed denture, ceramic- or resin-made, time of loading, fixation methods (screwed or cemented), platform switching, crown height (I-CH), extension of prosthetic cantilever (only for single-tooth restorations) (mesial and / or distal) (C-M, C-D), angle of emergency profile (mesial and distal) (C-M-EP, C-D-EP), presence of misfit of the prosthesis.
Clinical data will be completely anonymized through the association of each subject to one identification code, and the elimination of the document containing the link between them.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implant with peri-implantitis
Implant with progressive marginal bone loss
Dental implant positioning
observational study of the effect of implant malposition
Healthy implant
Implant without any sign of marginal bone loss
Dental implant positioning
observational study of the effect of implant malposition
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implant positioning
observational study of the effect of implant malposition
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* subjects treated with dental implants at Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi during the period between January 1st, 2005, and June 30th, 2021
* subjects without any systemic disease that could be an impact on bone metabolism (e.g. diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, neoplasms)
* single and partial rehabilitations (without cantilever extension): single tooth restorations (one implant between two teeth or one single implant supporting single-tooth prosthesis with one adjacent tooth); multiple tooth restorations (one tooth per implant or bridges, splinted or not).
* complete information about patient status (systemic diseases, smoking status, medications, age, gender)
* complete description of the surgical and prosthetic protocol that was adopted.
* at least one periapical radiograph of good quality taken at the end of the intervention and a sufficient number of follow-up visits (at least one per year); the quality of the images will be assessed by the Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-Ray Equipment ((UK) 2018), accepting Grade 1 and Grade 2 images.
* having clinical and / or radiographic records to assess periodontal status at the time of intervention.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Quality assessment of radiographs. 2018. London: FGDP(UK); [accessed]. https://www.fgdp.org.uk/SiD/a2-quality-assessment-radiographs.
Arunyanak SP, Sophon N, Tangsathian T, Supanimitkul K, Suwanwichit T, Kungsadalpipob K. The effect of factors related to periodontal status toward peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Aug;30(8):791-799. doi: 10.1111/clr.13461. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
Canullo L, Tallarico M, Radovanovic S, Delibasic B, Covani U, Rakic M. Distinguishing predictive profiles for patient-based risk assessment and diagnostics of plaque induced, surgically and prosthetically triggered peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Oct;27(10):1243-1250. doi: 10.1111/clr.12738. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
Ferreira SD, Martins CC, Amaral SA, Vieira TR, Albuquerque BN, Cota LOM, Esteves Lima RP, Costa FO. Periodontitis as a risk factor for peri-implantitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Dent. 2018 Dec;79:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Francetti L, Cavalli N, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Ten years follow-up retrospective study on implant survival rates and prevalence of peri-implantitis in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Mar;30(3):252-260. doi: 10.1111/clr.13411. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
Lekholm U, Zarb GA. 1985. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence. p. 199-209.
Monje A, Aranda L, Diaz KT, Alarcon MA, Bagramian RA, Wang HL, Catena A. Impact of Maintenance Therapy for the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016 Apr;95(4):372-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034515622432. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983 Jun;39(2):499-503.
Yi Y, Koo KT, Schwarz F, Ben Amara H, Heo SJ. Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Mar;47(3):392-403. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13251. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMP-MAL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.