Manual or Digitally Guided Surgical Technique for Replacing Single Tooth Edentulism by Means of Sub-crestally Placed Implants. A 3-year Parallel Randomized Clinical Study on Marginal Bone Levels Stability

NCT ID: NCT06250621

Last Updated: 2024-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-10

Study Completion Date

2023-10-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present prospective study was to investigate after a 2-year of follow-up any influence of the surgical technique, manual or digitally guided, on peri-implant marginal bone levels stability in implants placed 1 mm sub-crestally.

Patients were treated by means of platform-switched implants provided with a 5 degrees internal conical connection and supporting single screw-retained fixed crowns. Marginal bone level (MBL) measured at prosthesis installation (t0) at 1 (t1), 2 (t2) and at 3 years of follow-up visit (t3) were considered. MBL change from t0 to t3 was investigated. The distance between the implant neck and the first radiographically detected bone to implant contact was considered to evaluate the bone loss. Two groups were considered: Test Group (GD) for implant sites treated with a digitally guided surgery procedure. Control Group (FH) for implants surgically placed without digitally guided surgery, respectively. All the procedures were performed by an experienced operator. Additionally, for both groups MBL changes were correlated to different supra-crestal soft tissue height (STH) amounts: less than 3 and ≥ 3 millimeters, respectively. Peri-implant soft tissue parameters such as probing depth (PPD), modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) and modified Plaque Index (mPI), were assessed for all the restorations included.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant Marginal Bone Loss Peri Implant Health Supral Tissue Height

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test Group (GD)

in this group were considered implant sites treated with a digitally guided surgery procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Implants were placed by means of a template for a guided surgery approach (GD Group) or with a standard free-hand surgical approach without any additional device (FH Group). A non expert doctor (less that 20 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the GD Group; a skilled operator (more than 1000 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the FH Group, respectively.

A two-stage surgical technique was chosen. Implants were placed (Anyridge, Megagen Implants, Seoul, Korea) 1 mm below the crestal level, as recommended by the manufacturer. After flap elevation the height of the supra-crestal soft tissue (STH) was measured by means of a calibrated probe.

An inter-implant distance of 3 mm at least, and/or an interproximal space from 1.5 to 3 mm between an implant and the adjacent tooth were observed.

Flaps were sutured over the implants to allow a submerged healing.

Control Group (FH)

in this group were considered implant sites treated without a digitally guided surgery procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Implants were placed by means of a template for a guided surgery approach (GD Group) or with a standard free-hand surgical approach without any additional device (FH Group). A non expert doctor (less that 20 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the GD Group; a skilled operator (more than 1000 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the FH Group, respectively.

A two-stage surgical technique was chosen. Implants were placed (Anyridge, Megagen Implants, Seoul, Korea) 1 mm below the crestal level, as recommended by the manufacturer. After flap elevation the height of the supra-crestal soft tissue (STH) was measured by means of a calibrated probe.

An inter-implant distance of 3 mm at least, and/or an interproximal space from 1.5 to 3 mm between an implant and the adjacent tooth were observed.

Flaps were sutured over the implants to allow a submerged healing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implant placement

Implants were placed by means of a template for a guided surgery approach (GD Group) or with a standard free-hand surgical approach without any additional device (FH Group). A non expert doctor (less that 20 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the GD Group; a skilled operator (more than 1000 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the FH Group, respectively.

A two-stage surgical technique was chosen. Implants were placed (Anyridge, Megagen Implants, Seoul, Korea) 1 mm below the crestal level, as recommended by the manufacturer. After flap elevation the height of the supra-crestal soft tissue (STH) was measured by means of a calibrated probe.

An inter-implant distance of 3 mm at least, and/or an interproximal space from 1.5 to 3 mm between an implant and the adjacent tooth were observed.

Flaps were sutured over the implants to allow a submerged healing.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* absence of mandibular and/or maxillary atrophy; presence of partial edentulism of at least one pair of elements and adequate amount of bone tissue to be able to insert an implant, i.e., a minimum amount of residual bone of 5 mm in thickness and 10 mm in height; presence of an antagonistic element with respect to the tooth to be rehabilitated.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients presenting with a clinical history of systemic diseases and metabolic deficits, presence or previous leukocyte dysfunction/deficiency, blood disorders, hemophilia, dicoumarolic drug therapy, treatment of prolonged steroid therapy, history of neoplasms resulting in chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in the head and neck district, history of chronic renal problems, chronic liver disease, bone metabolism disorders, uncontrolled endocrine disorders, and ongoing pregnancy and/or lactation. presence of local inflammation such as untreated periodontitis, bruxism condition or clenching habit, habitual oral infections, mucosal disorders (erosive lichen planus), oral lesions (ulcers, malignant lesions), inadequate oral hygiene, and poor compliance.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eugenio ER Romeo, Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Odontostomatologia I, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, P.O. S. Paolo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC 1564/18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.