Manual or Digitally Guided Surgical Technique for Replacing Single Tooth Edentulism by Means of Sub-crestally Placed Implants. A 3-year Parallel Randomized Clinical Study on Marginal Bone Levels Stability
NCT ID: NCT06250621
Last Updated: 2024-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-10
2023-10-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients were treated by means of platform-switched implants provided with a 5 degrees internal conical connection and supporting single screw-retained fixed crowns. Marginal bone level (MBL) measured at prosthesis installation (t0) at 1 (t1), 2 (t2) and at 3 years of follow-up visit (t3) were considered. MBL change from t0 to t3 was investigated. The distance between the implant neck and the first radiographically detected bone to implant contact was considered to evaluate the bone loss. Two groups were considered: Test Group (GD) for implant sites treated with a digitally guided surgery procedure. Control Group (FH) for implants surgically placed without digitally guided surgery, respectively. All the procedures were performed by an experienced operator. Additionally, for both groups MBL changes were correlated to different supra-crestal soft tissue height (STH) amounts: less than 3 and ≥ 3 millimeters, respectively. Peri-implant soft tissue parameters such as probing depth (PPD), modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) and modified Plaque Index (mPI), were assessed for all the restorations included.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MARGINAL BONE LEVELS AROUND IMPLANTS PLACED BY PARTIAL OR FULL-THICKNESS FLAP: A 3-YEAR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT06926101
Effect of L-PRF on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Levels.
NCT06516263
Trans-gingival or Subcrestal Short Implants Posterior Maxilla Bone Changes
NCT05975138
The Role of a New Prosthodontics Device in Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Subcrestal Implant Placement
NCT06182670
A Triple-blinded Non-inferiority Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Hybrid and Fully Etched Implants P1
NCT06100120
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Test Group (GD)
in this group were considered implant sites treated with a digitally guided surgery procedure
Implant placement
Implants were placed by means of a template for a guided surgery approach (GD Group) or with a standard free-hand surgical approach without any additional device (FH Group). A non expert doctor (less that 20 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the GD Group; a skilled operator (more than 1000 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the FH Group, respectively.
A two-stage surgical technique was chosen. Implants were placed (Anyridge, Megagen Implants, Seoul, Korea) 1 mm below the crestal level, as recommended by the manufacturer. After flap elevation the height of the supra-crestal soft tissue (STH) was measured by means of a calibrated probe.
An inter-implant distance of 3 mm at least, and/or an interproximal space from 1.5 to 3 mm between an implant and the adjacent tooth were observed.
Flaps were sutured over the implants to allow a submerged healing.
Control Group (FH)
in this group were considered implant sites treated without a digitally guided surgery procedure
Implant placement
Implants were placed by means of a template for a guided surgery approach (GD Group) or with a standard free-hand surgical approach without any additional device (FH Group). A non expert doctor (less that 20 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the GD Group; a skilled operator (more than 1000 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the FH Group, respectively.
A two-stage surgical technique was chosen. Implants were placed (Anyridge, Megagen Implants, Seoul, Korea) 1 mm below the crestal level, as recommended by the manufacturer. After flap elevation the height of the supra-crestal soft tissue (STH) was measured by means of a calibrated probe.
An inter-implant distance of 3 mm at least, and/or an interproximal space from 1.5 to 3 mm between an implant and the adjacent tooth were observed.
Flaps were sutured over the implants to allow a submerged healing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implant placement
Implants were placed by means of a template for a guided surgery approach (GD Group) or with a standard free-hand surgical approach without any additional device (FH Group). A non expert doctor (less that 20 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the GD Group; a skilled operator (more than 1000 implants placed in the professional activity) was selected for the procedures related to the FH Group, respectively.
A two-stage surgical technique was chosen. Implants were placed (Anyridge, Megagen Implants, Seoul, Korea) 1 mm below the crestal level, as recommended by the manufacturer. After flap elevation the height of the supra-crestal soft tissue (STH) was measured by means of a calibrated probe.
An inter-implant distance of 3 mm at least, and/or an interproximal space from 1.5 to 3 mm between an implant and the adjacent tooth were observed.
Flaps were sutured over the implants to allow a submerged healing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eugenio ER Romeo, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Odontostomatologia I, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, P.O. S. Paolo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo
Milan, MI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EC 1564/18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.