The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-03

Study Completion Date

2023-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Implants will be placed in posterior maxilla using two drilling methods; the osseodensification technique and conventional drilling protocols. Implant stability will be measured after implant placement , 1,2,3,4,6 and 8 weeks and 3 months later. Insertion torque will be evaluated at the termination of implant placement and crestal bone loss will be measured post-implant insertion, after 3 months and after 6 and 12 months of loading. Post-operative pain and patients' satisfaction will be assessed as well. implant survival will be assessed at the end of the follow up period

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques

NCT06599112

Implant Stability

RECRUITING NA

Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol

NCT06917638

Implant Complication

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Thread Designs on Primary Stability of Dental Implant Using Osseodensification Technique in Posterior Maxilla : Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT07242716

Primary Stability of Knife Threads Dental Implant Versus Double Threads Using Osseodensification Technique

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol

NCT06992557

Implant Stability Low Speed Drilling

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture

NCT06590753

Implant Site Reaction

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Stability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

the statistician will be masked

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Densah burs

Osseodensification using Densah burs

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Densah Burs

Intervention Type DEVICE

osseodensification method

Standard drills

conventional drilling using standard drills

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard drills

Intervention Type DEVICE

conventional drilling

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Densah Burs

osseodensification method

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard drills

conventional drilling

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: \>18 years; medically free,
* Partially edentulous patients in maxillary posterior area (premolar-molar area)
* Sufficient ridge height
* Sufficient ridge width
* Adequate soft tissue biotype.
* Patients with adequate inter-arch space for placement of implant prosthetic part.
* Cooperative patients with good oral hygiene
* Patients who accept to sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Active periodontal diseases
* Parafunctional habits.
* History of radiation therapy to the head and neck
* Bone augmentation to implant site
* Smoking
* Pregnant females

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes