Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture

NCT06590753

Implant Site Reaction

RECRUITING NA

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol

NCT06307691

Implant Complication

RECRUITING NA

Primary Stability of Immediate Implant Using Versah Versus Conventional Burs

NCT05960916

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

UNKNOWN NA

Comparison of Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling on the Stability of Tapered and Cylindrical Implants.

NCT07244185

Tooth Absence

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques

NCT06599112

Implant Stability

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A bifurcation inter-radicular bone of 2 mm or more in a none restorable lower molar will be needed in order to successfully be able to drill the bone with conventional or Osseo densification burs, followed by placing the implant at this site. A xenograft bone material will be used to fill the extraction socket and a customized temporary abutment using flowable composite and a silicone mold will be fabricated and placed over it after polishing it.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Immediate Dental Implant Placement Conventional Drilling Technique Osseodensification Drilling Technique

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Osseodensification burs

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osseodensification burs

Intervention Type OTHER

Densah burs are osseodensification burs used to condense bone and prepare dental implant site, unlike conventional technique which cuts and removes the bone

Conventional Burs

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional burs

Intervention Type OTHER

Preparation of dental implant site by the Conventional technique using Conventional burs that are subtractive

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Osseodensification burs

Densah burs are osseodensification burs used to condense bone and prepare dental implant site, unlike conventional technique which cuts and removes the bone

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional burs

Preparation of dental implant site by the Conventional technique using Conventional burs that are subtractive

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient age 25 to 45 years old
2. Systemically and periodontally healthy individuals.
3. Non-smokers or light smokers (Less than 5 cigarettes a day) (Schane 2010).
4. Good oral hygiene.
5. Healthy remaining dentition.
6. Adequate quality and quantity of bone
7. Interradicular septum ≥ 2 mm (Bleyan, 2022).
8. Mandibular non-restorable molars.
9. Type A or B socket (Smith and Tarnow, 2013).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute inflammation or infection in the implant region.
2. Patients with mental disorders who could not cooperate with treatment or communicate normally.
3. Patients who have severe systemic disorders (Uncontrolled Diabetes, Uncontrolled Hypertension, End stage kidney or liver diseases and Severe Heart diseases) .
4. Poor oral hygiene.
5. Active periodontal disease.
6. Uncooperative patients, not willing to adhere to post-surgical instructions and follow up visits.

Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No